Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Shocking Realization

Reading through the Baker-bashing post below... and hearing the various reasons why many people oppose trading Ichiro... I was shocked to discover that so many people expect us to compete for the division crown next year. Honestly, I hadn't even considered that possibility. I understand that 2009 is impossible to predict, since we don't even know who the GM will be, let alone who he/she will sign or trade. But please vote below so that I can figure out if there's any LOL consensus on an overall optimism or pessimism going forward.

Poll
In 2009, the Mariners will...
Make all the right off-season moves and win the AL West, finally putting an end to Angles hegemony.
11 votes
Finish a close second, and maybe vie for the wild card.
13 votes
Finish somewhere in the middle of the pack.
63 votes
Struggle to avoid the basement, appearing helpless and hopeless.
39 votes

126 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 75 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I wouldn't dare put any sort of prediction down

since, among other things, we don’t know who’s going to be running the show, but I think the consensus at least among Jeff, Graham, Dave, Derek and others is that it is possible for this team to compete in 2009 if the right moves are made.

by Matthew on Jun 27, 2008 11:05 AM PDT reply actions  

Right

I agree they have the right pieces. I think they just need a smart GM that knows how to fill in the holes cheaply and cut the dead weight before its too late.

Jl/Robert '08: Promise for a CoachCage tomorrow!

by Fin on Jun 27, 2008 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

I put one down for middle of the pack.

Because it’s the Mariners, so no matter who it is we won’t like them and at best they’ll probably make just enough moves to not be awful.

Now I’m hoping for better. Just not expecting it.

Yesterday's Pants
A blog-thingy about the Mariners and stuff.

by BrettJMiller on Jun 27, 2008 11:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

I am the one who started this bandwagon

I am a ray of hope in the thundering shitstorm that is Mariner baseball.

Give you're propers to the all time rec leader.

by JI on Jun 27, 2008 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Good question

Might be more important to ask, “Is it even possible to compete in 2009?” since the second question is whether or not to sell off Putz, Ichiro, Bedard for prospects.

by johnbai on Jun 27, 2008 11:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think it's possible

I have very little confidence that the team will make the moves I think it would take to get the team competing again

by Graham MacAree on Jun 27, 2008 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

It would be easier to evaluate after the deadline on the off chance we can figure out a way to dump

Washburn for example.

You’re not going to make moves on Bedard or Putz until the winter at the earliest anyways.

by Matthew on Jun 27, 2008 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Too early to say anything

but the right GM can fix this team without sucking up a whole lot of payroll. There’s a chance for next season, but we’re going to have to wait until a new GM is hired to figure out how good a chance it is.

by BrianL on Jun 27, 2008 11:14 AM PDT reply actions  

I will go you one better

and predict that we will win somewhere between 60 and 100 games.

by johnbai on Jun 27, 2008 11:16 AM PDT up reply actions  

too risky

Jl/Robert '08: Promise for a CoachCage tomorrow!

by Fin on Jun 27, 2008 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Whoah, ease off that crystal ball there, buddy.

Let’s just wait and see how this plays out before we make any wild assumptions.

by Liebkartoffel on Jun 27, 2008 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm confident they'll compete.

Just getting rid of Sexson, Vidro and moving Ibanez out of LF would substantially improve the team. I’d like to think anyone they hire can not possibly be as dense as Bill Bavasi.

by Sklyansky on Jun 27, 2008 11:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Whither Washburn, Batista and Silva?

They’re still on the payroll, still aren’t very good and still occupying rotation spots.

by Gomez on Jun 27, 2008 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Silva's the only real long term problem there.

Washburn isn’t completely immovable, and neither is Batista, and IIRC they’ve only got one year to go on their contracts.

Washburn is left handed and has a pulse, so there’s probably somebody dumb enough to take on his contract (although it is possible the only guy who would have done that was fired by the M’s). Batista was reasonably effective last year, and if they can’t find a taker, then worst case scenario he would be a sunk cost for ‘09.

They have a lot of money coming off of the payroll next year, and if they hire a half-way competent GM they should be more than capable of competing for at least a wild card spot.

by Sklyansky on Jun 27, 2008 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Those contracts are awful, but this team has the payroll to eat them.

And Silva isn’t good, but he’s worth a rotation spot.

As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball.

by Aaron Campeau on Jun 27, 2008 12:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

The payroll's not the big issue

It’s their usage. Since they’re a big part of the payroll, they’re all but assured rotation spots, even if there are more fruitful options available. How do you tell a $9-12 million annual pitcher that he’ll be working long relief because his spot just got handed to RRS or somebody?

by Gomez on Jun 27, 2008 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

The Mariners have been historically terrible about doing such things, but that doesn’t mean they can’t start. Other teams do it all the time.

As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball.

by Aaron Campeau on Jun 27, 2008 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

Shit, posted before I finished

That said, that Batista and Washburn are coming off the books after next year is good, though Silva remains a concern, plus that puts a low ceiling on the rotation’s potential for 2009.

by Gomez on Jun 27, 2008 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

If Batista is in fact hurt, I think he could be an asset in the bullpen.

And I wouldn’t be surprised to see Washurn traded to an NL team for glove oil, assuming the M’s eat some salary.

Now, we’ll see how this all plays out in reality, but because everything is so uncertain, I’m going to hold out hope that the new front office does things semi-intelligently.

As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball.

by Aaron Campeau on Jun 27, 2008 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

The issue really

is that said expensive pitchers are low upside, high downside guys that limit the team’s potential for 2009. And any guys you get to replace them are, at best, a bit above replacement level. Does a team with Silva or Washburn as their #2 contend in 2009?

(And this assumes that the team does indeed deal Bedard, as they’ve been reported to be looking into doing)

by Gomez on Jun 27, 2008 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't necessarily disagree.

I just think there’s more than one way to skin a cat, and I think the right GM could make all the difference.

As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball.

by Aaron Campeau on Jun 27, 2008 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Why would you assume that?

That action is incompatible with contending in 2009. If they deal Bedard, nobody is saying “compete in 2009.”

by Matthew on Jun 27, 2008 2:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm addressing the issue of competing in 2009 either way

The remark about assuming Bedard is only to head off the potential response, “Well, Silva wouldn’t be the #2, Bedard would be the #2.” Either way, Silva/Washburn/Batista’s relevance in the discussion of whether this team competes in 2009 still stands.

by Gomez on Jun 27, 2008 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, Silva wouldn't be the #2, Bedard would be the #2.

That’s a huge point. You can’t just dismiss it. Silva, Wash and Batista (or a replacement 5th SP) make up the back end of the rotation. You can compete with a back end rotation that’s average to slightly below, especially if it’s headed by two guys who can be well above average.

Competing in 2009 is possible.

by Matthew on Jun 27, 2008 3:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

So the M's aren't trading Bedard?

I thought they were hard-up to do it before the deadline.

by Gomez on Jun 27, 2008 8:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah,

you’d like to think that, wouldn’t you?

by Liebkartoffel on Jun 27, 2008 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

All depends on the GM

Is it possible? Yeah. The new GM could sign high-price free agents, sell the farm system, win the division, fall on its face in the first round, and then not be able to compete for 4-5 years.

It’s possible that we have a smart GM, struggle for a year, then actually have an opportunity to compete.

There’s just too many variables.

by TheEmrys on Jun 27, 2008 11:32 AM PDT reply actions  

Shit.

I meant to post that on my alt.

by qrsouther on Jun 27, 2008 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wont tell anybody I'm just bored

I’ve known Coach’s alternate USSM username for a few months now.

by Robert on Jun 27, 2008 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

!

Asking would be unfair, but that’s a nut I’d like to crack myself.

As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball.

by Aaron Campeau on Jun 27, 2008 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

A lot of work to do

Step 1: send Morrow to AA or AAA to become a starter. Do this now, my fantasy team be damned.

Step 2: DFA or trade (hah!) Sexson, Vidro, Washburn and Batista. Kick them hard as they leave…well Sexson at least for lying about his injury last year…and Washburn for being a douche.

Step 3: Make whatever deals can be made to fill holes at 1B DH/LF and SPx2. Preferably trade players that are themselves easily replaced (Ibanez, Betancourt, Johjima, relief pitchers). If you MUST trade Ichiro, Beltre or Bedard HAVE A FRICKING PLAN FOR REPLACING THEM!! Do NOT repeat the Bedard deal which hurt the team in two ways and was therefore NOT a “win now” trade.

Step 3: Evaluate guys in the system. Can RRS start? Can Diaz play LF? What about draftees? Is Josh Fields ready to pitch in the Majors now? Can Dennis Raben step in and play 1B, RF or DH next year? Can he come up after a couple of months in Tacoma? This should bear on trades as well.

Step 3: Fill holes with free agents if necessary. Getting a fourth or fifth starter in FA is normally a bad idea, but the market may be changing enough in this area for it to make sense. A lot of guys didn’t get snapped up last year like they used to. I don’t know what next year’s market for corner outfielders is, but it’s a better bet than SP usually.

For some reason I voted that the M’s would win the division next year. But with all the questions they have to answer and (for now) only Lee Pelekoudas to answer them…I’m being way too optimistic.

by short on Jun 27, 2008 12:20 PM PDT reply actions  

This begs a question.

Now that Jeff has changed the title, do we now have to care about peoples’ fantasy teams?

by Faux on Jun 27, 2008 12:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Let me put it this way,

it was a harmless, incredible indirect reference to a fantasy team.

I was still tempted to hide the comment.

Do not talk about fantasy teams. Even in jest. It’s not funny.

by Matthew on Jun 27, 2008 1:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry dude

I thought it was harmless. I don’t quite understand the rage about it all. I understand that Jeff et al really don’t want this to become a fantasy chat room… but there’s plenty of room here for idle chatter about craigs list losers, beer, rosterbation, etc. Not sure why fantasy provokes such heat from on high. :(

by johnbai on Jun 27, 2008 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Jeff doesn't like hearing about fantasy teams

Maybe its just a pet peeve of his (and Matthew)? But yea, the big three are basically religion, politics, and fantasy teams.

Jl/Robert '08: Promise for a CoachCage tomorrow!

by Fin on Jun 27, 2008 10:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

They will...

make the right offseason moves by rebuilding this team and finish in the middle of the pack.

by SaberR on Jun 27, 2008 3:44 PM PDT reply actions  

With 45 votes in

Pessimism is winning. But it’s tempered pessimism, not the suicidal kind.

Interestingly, wild optimism is beating cautious optimism 2-1.

by johnbai on Jun 27, 2008 4:13 PM PDT reply actions  

Tempered pessimism ----> cynicism

I usually choose cynicism over pessimism, but even I don’t think this team’s anywhere near the right track, and that they can overtake the Rangers or A’s, who IMO have since moved past them in terms of competitive development.

by Gomez on Jun 27, 2008 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Can't vote

too many unknowns at this juncture. I do agree with the seeming consensus that while this team can contend given the right GM/moves made, they probably wont because they’re the Mariners.

Hooray beer!

by Omerta on Jun 28, 2008 2:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Starlin Castro's fit with Seattle
Kawasaki80_small
Lists! So many lists!
M_s_hat_copy_small
OT -- May 22nd In Memoriam
Ichiro_small
Why do managers and media members hate walks?
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Dustin Ackley BP swing vs game swing
Beastquakerwallpaper_small
More on the Struggles of Smoak
Randy2_for_sbn_small
Albert Pujols 2012: Three Retrospectives
Small
On Batting Orders
Niehaus_small
More on Dustin Ackley and the strikezone

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew

Claw_small JY