Bad Teams Blame Their Best Players And Also Their Worst Players
Interim general manager Lee Pelekoudas and Mariners executives were in meetings for much of Tuesday to discuss plans for the rest of the season, which could include releasing first baseman Richie Sexson in the upcoming days, according to a report in the Everett Herald.
Richie's release has been a foregone conclusion for a little while now, as he's failed to take any strides forward from a year ago and in so doing has become, on any given day, the most hated man in Safeco. That whole thing about changing his stance made for a good story, but gun to my head, I'd say they did it for two reasons: (1) to have an excuse to bench him over a homestand and shelter him from the booing, and (2) to buy themselves a little more time as they search for a replacement. This gives them a pretense under which they can keep playing him a little while longer "to see how he adjusts" while they wait for someone more qualified than Miguel Cairo to start looking like a qualified stopgap. So in that regard I think the stance thing was intended more to help the Mariners than to help Richie Sexson.
This is the sort of problem we warn against when we say that a player's contract is too long. They're not empty concerns. They're real, and this is a perfect example of why. At first it can be easy to ignore how much a player costs, but if a front office decides to throw caution to the wind and chuck money around all willy-nilly until there's nothing left to spend, danger may swiftly approach. God knows we've seen it first-hand on far too many occasions. I'd rather overspend in years than overspend in players, but I'd also rather overspend in money than overspend in years, and in a hypothetical utopia I'd rather not overspend at all. It's a bigger problem than a lot of people think it is, because even just one bad player living out the end of a long contract can weigh a team down. If you know you're giving too long of a contract you better be damn sure the player in question will make it worthwhile in the short-term, but those players don't come along very often, and Richie Sexson was never one of them.
I'd eulogize Richie, but for one thing, he's not yet gone, and for another, it would be about a year and a half too late. I don't know if he's completely and utterly finished, but he's finished with the Mariners, because he doesn't want to be in Seattle and Seattle doesn't want him to be in Seattle. While I guess you could call it a mutual break-up, this is only happening at the finale of a one-sided abusive relationship, and one party is coming out of it in much better shape than the other. For all the crap he's taken, both justified and not, Richie made his millions while the team sank like a stone, and at the end of the day he managed to outlast the guy who hired him, in no small part due to Richie's own performance. There's something poetic in there, although I don't care to find it.
Learn from this, Mariners. There are lessons in each and every one of your countless mistakes, but lessons are only effective when learnt.
0 recs |
13 comments
Comments
I think the lengthy coda of this stupid, stupid song
is: learn to develop a healthier org.
It’s inconceivable to me that this org’s stopgap at 1b is Miguel Cairo. I know Fontaine’s done a great job, and the player development folks have some reasonable success stories to point to, esp. with Halman in AA or whatever.
But you can’t run an organization that can’t find a 1B to hit .230 (now, I guess, nobody DOES run such an org).
The agonizingly slow death of Sexson has been annoying, but it never should have become an anchor. For reasons I can’t imagine (he was signed coming off of major surgery), the team was totally unprepared for him to miss or play poorly in roughly 5 games. The team had a while to fix the problem (and the related problem at DH), and actually did worse: by half-heartedly trying to move Clement and by having LaHair as starting 1B in Tacoma for 2 years now (1/2 of 2006, all of 2007, half of 2008). As bad as this situation is at first glance, it just gets worse the closer you look.
by marc w on Jun 18, 2008 4:08 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Our minors haven't made any decent sluggers in a long ass time
We go too heavy on toolsy guys who can do it all. Sometimes you just want a big guy who can mash the ball.
by Edgar for Pres on Jun 18, 2008 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bad Teams Blame Their Best Players
This is the very first lesson I ever learned in Advanced Baseball Analysis 101.
by JI on Jun 18, 2008 4:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
"There's something poetic in there, although I don't care to find it."
I love that line.
by Man From Nantucket on Jun 18, 2008 4:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Why isn't Ibanez moving to 1st?
Allowing us to field the Wlad, Reed, Ichiro outfield. Also give time to Clement at C, and have Kenji DH. Dump Vidro, dump Sexson. Cairo and Bloomquist is all the bench you need, since they can play any position between them.
Who cares if Wlad and Clement struggle? They have to go through rookie adjustment sometime… and it just helps us in the Strassberg sweepstakes, right?
Sadly, Jamie Burke should go to AAA or be traded (or DH if you can trade Kenji.)
by johnbai on Jun 18, 2008 4:34 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Clear out the dead wood and give playing time to everyone that's supposed to help you next year
by johnbai on Jun 18, 2008 4:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wait...
Are you saying you want our new GM to play first base?
"Sit down and watch the game!" www.StopTheWave.com
by ConorGlassey on Jun 18, 2008 4:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why do you want Kenji to DH?
And why do you suggest DH’ing Burke if you trade Kenji?
by Edgar for Pres on Jun 18, 2008 9:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sexson was a very good value in the short term
In 2005 the Mariners paid him $4.5 and he provided .263 /.369/.541/.910. A great bargain. Of course, that contract was backloaded as heavily as it is because of the team’s self-imposed total payroll constraints in 2005.
by Steve Nelson on Jun 18, 2008 5:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
When I say "worthwhile in the short-term"
what I mean is “helps achieve or get close to achieving a championship.” Sexson was indeed a fantastic bargain his first year here, but that team was never going to win anything, so it didn’t really mean all that much. I guess this is in the same vein as the whole flags-fly-forever deal.
by Jeff on Jun 18, 2008 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
So
is this why the Dodgers blame Billingsley, Kemp and Loney for their failures instead of Juan Pierre, Jeff Kent and Andruw Jones?
The poster formerly known as Matt.
by bluemax on Jun 18, 2008 5:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't blame Richie one bit...
Athletes fail in one of two ways- their skills diminish over time as they get older or their weaknesses are exploited by their opponents or they don’t put in any effort to improve. I don’t think Richie was the type who didn’t give a shit.
Bavasi, on the other hand, what “skills” diminish in a GM? Or a manager for that matter? The reason they fail is they are either too stupid or too pigheaded to recognize when they’ve made a mistake and keep making the same mistakes over and over.
Bavasi isn’t gone because of Sexson- Bavasi is gone because of Sexson, Spiezio, Guillien, Moyer, Batista, Aurilia, Reese, Washburn, Everett, Weaver, Freddy Garcia and the other dozen and a half shit trades and signings he made. If someone offers me four years and $50 million am I going to say, “No, I refuse your money- I will suck ass in 2007 and 2008- only give me a two year deal.”?
by RustyJohn on Jun 18, 2008 8:45 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I blame Richie a lot
He sucks huge man testicles.
by Edgar for Pres on Jun 18, 2008 9:48 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 













