Article about pitch fx
The scene at the Pitch f/x summit was symbolic of baseball's increasing wonkiness. The 52 attendees — some of them college professors — met to discuss how to improve the system and how to interpret its results. Participants swapped theories about determining the coefficient of drag and made jokes about the difficulty analyzing Boston pitcher Tim Wakefield's knuckleball. Nine major-league clubs sent representatives to the summit, including the New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox and Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim. It isn't clear how many teams are using the data — although some clearly are.
Before this season, Brian Bannister, a Kansas City Royals starting pitcher, noticed that when batters connected with his pitches and put them in play, about 27% became base hits — a figure far lower than the typical 30%. Some analysts said Mr. Bannister was simply lucky. But after checking the data from Pitch f/x, Mr. Bannister noticed batters who'd hit his curveball were much less successful than those who'd hit his fastball. The upshot: his most effective pitch may be a hittable curve.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
OK, so reading the comments was stupid of me
why do these people think Pitch f/x is an umpire?
And next year, they really should invite Bannister on a telecon or something
that might be one of the most fascinating discussions ever.
by seattlebruin on May 29, 2008 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions
Those comments were depressing. The future is doomed.
I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.
You should.
And then watch Idiocracy. Note the similarities.
I like using semi-colons; they make me feel smart.
It's good to see Mat Olkin working
It’s sad to see that it’s with the KC Royals instead of the Mariners.
This cracked me up when I first noticed.
How you know you’re a hopeless baseball nerd: You geek out about sitting at the same table as Mat Olkin.
No
I’m just going to dork out like you wouldn’t believe.
by Jeff Sullivan on May 29, 2008 12:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah but only you losers make those jokes
by Graham MacAree on May 29, 2008 12:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Have you been drinking JI?
Because your spelling has been impeccable for the last three posts.
I like midgets more than I should.
I've only read a little bit about HITf/x
but everything I’ve heard makes me want to giddily prance around the office in excitement.
He wants a belly rub.
"I've seen many, many blue skies turn gray, but the sun will eventually return, and so will I. So will I." - Carlos Pena
by R.J. Anderson on May 29, 2008 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm not an analyst, so I could be totallly wrong.
From my limited knowledge, however, it seems as though HITf/x is going to be the thing that allows individual defensive metrics to finally get to a level of reliability.
-aaron c.
by Aaron Campeau on May 29, 2008 12:58 PM PDT up reply actions
In the eventual world with PITCHf/x, HITf/x, and camera-based fielding metrics, we will never need things like HR or batting average ever again
by Jeff Sullivan on May 29, 2008 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions
It's sad because it's true :(
Yesterday's Pants
A blog-thingy about the Mariners and stuff.
by BrettJMiller on May 29, 2008 1:11 PM PDT up reply actions
I think I just wet myself.
It’s a shame that it will be another 50 years before the Mariners recognize that these tools exist.
OR UMPIRES OR HUMANZ OR BATS!!!111!
UR RUINENG MY GAME AND DIRTT KIKEING!
-aaron c.
by Aaron Campeau on May 29, 2008 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Eh, we've all gotta' go sometime.
-aaron c.
by Aaron Campeau on May 29, 2008 1:09 PM PDT up reply actions
Are you saying that our DH is ahead of his time?
by Alex B on May 29, 2008 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions 8 recs
Were it possible
I would gladly recommend this comment several times.
-aaron c.
by Aaron Campeau on May 29, 2008 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions













