Lookout Landing: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Offensive Offense

The Last Seven Games
4-3, 27 RS, 19 RA

That's some excellent run prevention, but some lousy lousy offense. They've looked terrible, but have they actually been terrible, or have they been unlucky or faced good pitching? You don't need to face good pitchers to have faced good pitching, that's important to note. Look at Miguel Batista's last start. In an effort to get a better handle on the offensive woes the last seven games, I went back through the box scores and noted some key, to me, numbers. Here's a rundown with the league average number presented in parenthesis:

Star-divide

-Opposing pitchers have thrown just under 62% of pitches for strikes during that span (just over 62%).
-Mariner hitters have swung at and missed at 6.34% of pitches (7.90%).
-Mariner hitters have seen 3.50 pitches/PA (3.78).
-Mariner hitter's BABIP is .260 (.294).
-Mariner hitters have put up a 49/35/16 GB/FB/LD line (46/35/19).

The Mariners haven't been facing, on average, noticeably poor control. What they have been doing is putting the bat on the ball at a better clip. That is part of what is driving the shorter at bats, but certainly not all. Seattle is definitely being more aggressive at the plate. This could be a result of a shift (or regression) in philosophy or it could be a result of pitchers getting ahead on the first pitch more often. This is what seems to be the case with Jose Lopez the last few games. He's watched the first pitch go by in his last 21 plate appearances and pitchers are already starting to groove that first pitch in there, putting him at an 0-1 hole nearly every at bat. Once in a 0-1 count, Lopez is forced to become more aggressive and, facing pitchers who aren't missing bats, this is going to result in shorter at bats.

If the hitters aren't drawing walks and also aren't missing the ball leading to strikeouts, that leaves one main result; putting the ball in play. And that's where they're getting killed right now. That .260 BABIP, a whopping 34 points below league average. Right now, that's working out to the difference of an entire hit per game, or the equivalent of about 0.8 runs/game or 5-6 runs during the total span. 32 or 33 runs would put us at 4.57-4.71 runs per game, which is respectable, projecting out to about 760 runs/season.

Is the BABIP all fluke? No. As you can see from the final point, they are hitting less line drives and in fact, their BABIP-LD% rate of .100 is only a little under the league average rate of .104. But that's not the most robust measurement and given that all the non-line drives are in the form of ground balls, you wouldn't expect to see the same penalty as if the team were getting flyball-happy.

If there's a conclusion to be drawn, it's this. The offense has looked bad this past week (it's worth noting that apparently many of them are sick), but the underlying stats suggest that they've been about half unlucky and half bad. Their approach does seem to have changed, for the worst, but it's too small a sample to say anything. Nevertheless, sign Bonds. Sign him now.

0 recs  |  Comment 32 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Seems like we've hit an awful lot of liners right at people this week

and it’s not really helping that a few guys seemingly never have their grounders sneak through the IF.
Player – 2008 BABIP (Career)
Ichiro – .280(.358)
Johjima – .211(.280)
Wilkerson =( – .242(.316)

Ichiro and Kenji are still putting up decent LD/GB/FB numbers – close to their career averages, which would seem to suggest they’ll eventually regress, which would be very helpful for this offense

Wilkerson… his LD (SSS!!!) rate is way down, and in person, he’s looked terrible at the plate in every regard but patience. Thoughts?

by seattlebruin on Apr 24, 2008 3:54 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

"Sign Bonds. Sign him now."

Ah, if we only had an organization that cared more about winning than image.

by The Beer Baron on Apr 24, 2008 3:56 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

We do - they're called the Sonics

and it’d be pretty hard to argue that they care about image right now… =(

by seattlebruin on Apr 24, 2008 3:58 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Based on evidence

they don’t seem to care much about winning either, though.

Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.

by pdb on Apr 24, 2008 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They seem to care about winning

they’re just not very good at it. Two years from now though…

by seattlebruin on Apr 24, 2008 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

To be honest, they cared about winning to know when to rebuild.

Say what you want about Bennett and Stern, but Presti knows what he’s doing.

I like midgets more than I should.

by Thingray on Apr 24, 2008 4:32 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's what I meant though

or that they are smart enough to know how to build a team that will eventually win

by seattlebruin on Apr 24, 2008 4:37 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

They have two good young players already, and are going to draft high enough to add at least one more.

Unless Presti really screws up, they should have a pretty solid team wherever they end up playing.

I like midgets more than I should.

by Thingray on Apr 24, 2008 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, they really will be

although I’m still very concerned about this whole “Kevin Durant can play the two” thing. Seems like a much better use of him would be as a thin four-man, where he would be a ridiculous mismatch on offense and on D and when rebounding he could use his natural length/athleticism to alter shots and make up for how skinny he is.

by seattlebruin on Apr 24, 2008 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I'm not a huge basketball nut, but the two seems like an odd spot for him.

I keep hoping maybe it’s a temporary move to give him time to adjust to the NBA schedule without getting so beat up and worn down in the paint. Then once he adjust and adds some bulk he moves into the four or something like that.

I like midgets more than I should.

by Thingray on Apr 24, 2008 5:02 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Overall I like this strategy

It didn’t work very well with the Clippers though.

by don gato on Apr 24, 2008 5:03 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, the Clippers had a misanthropic scrooge as an owner

and they have been VERY unlucky in terms of injuries the past two seasons

by seattlebruin on Apr 24, 2008 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course

There are clubs that care about winning that haven’t signed him yet.

by ThundaPC on Apr 24, 2008 4:22 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No kidding

I actually got some work done today

by The Beer Baron on Apr 24, 2008 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

I got a scary amount of work done

though the thing is I am a short timer, so I’m not suppose to get things done

by InSpokane on Apr 24, 2008 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

How early for bobblehead?

It didn’t seem worth making a new diary FanPost for this, so I’m asking on the front-page story.

I have tickets for the game tomorrow. I didn’t intend to go on Ichiro bobblehead day, but that just turned out to be the day that worked out best for us.

But now that I’m going, I’m wondering if I should try to get bobbleheads after all. How early would we have to get in line to have a reasonable shot at it? Is it like 6:00? 5:00? noon? I have no idea.

formerly known as mdl

by iglew on Apr 24, 2008 4:32 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm going tomorrow as well, Sec 237 in the Terrace Club (corporate perk).

I don’t think the gates even open until 5:30 or so, but I’d guess you’d have to line up pretty early to get a Bobblehead. People are crazy about those cheap little things.

Personally I’m not going to even try to get one. I might even get there at the last second just to make sure I don’t get stuck in the “bobble head crowd”.

I like midgets more than I should.

by Thingray on Apr 24, 2008 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

So I'm trying to figure out

if this is a new and improved Jose Lopez, or just a figment of my imagination.

I know he’s taking more pitches because he’s not swinging at the first pitch…. but is he really any better then last year or is he just having a good run with BaBIP?

2007 – .252 .284 .355 .639 (complete year)
2008 – .294 .301 .388 .689 (partial year)

.040 in batting average, but less then .020 increase in OPB and only .033 improvement in slugging.

He doesn’t really seem to have made any strides other then having gotten his batting average up higher.

Midnight Baseball - No Lights - Only in Alaska!

by MfaninAlaska on Apr 24, 2008 5:18 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

He's hitting the ball harder

But yes, I think his stats have failed, up to this point to catch up with his new approach

by seattlebruin on Apr 24, 2008 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

*have failed to

It’s not every day you can miss TWO words in a sentence..,

by seattlebruin on Apr 24, 2008 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

how do sacrifices

weigh down his OBP… they don’t count as at-bats in the statistics, so they shouldn’t have an overall effect.

50 points of OPS is huge, but it still doesn’t move him above .700, which in my book is still bad.

Midnight Baseball - No Lights - Only in Alaska!

by MfaninAlaska on Apr 24, 2008 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

OBP = (H + BB + HBP) / (AB + BB + HBP + SF)

Lopez already has five sac flies (only three all of last year), which have cost him 17 points of OBP.

by Jeff on Apr 24, 2008 6:23 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

but

the SF doesn’t count as an AB, so if it was just a Fly out where the runner didn’t score… it would be the same OBP as it would be with the SF.

for example 15 AB 0SF = 10AB 5SF

Am I right or am I missing something?

Midnight Baseball - No Lights - Only in Alaska!

by MfaninAlaska on Apr 24, 2008 6:33 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, you're right, I just confused myself

I choose to blame the servers for this.

However what is hurting Lopez’s OBP are the at bats (such as one last night) where he’s clearly trying to hit behind the runner rather than strike the ball hard.

by Jeff on Apr 24, 2008 6:46 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

that I can agree with

although he’s managed to get quite a few singles doing that….... he is popping up alot less this year (or at least it seems that way).

Midnight Baseball - No Lights - Only in Alaska!

by MfaninAlaska on Apr 24, 2008 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.
Start posting about the Mariners »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Max_small
FootbaLL IV (Nov 21st)
Small
The Sabermetrics of Cats

Recent FanPosts

Laughing_man_elmex_small
AFL Championship game thread
Smell-the-glove_small
OFFTOP 11/19 - The Hand of Fraud
Small
Tony Blengino interview on 710 AM ESPN Seattle's Hot Stove League
Ichirocameron_small
OTFPOTD 11/16: Recipes Edition
Small
Lookout Landing as a communtiy
Small
Royals determined to unload Callaspo...
Ichiro_small
Ackley and Triunfel on MLB TV right now
Small
Xbox LLive, Pt 3

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Sexy People

1_small Graham

Small Matthew

Small Jeff