Video embedding

by JI on Apr 17, 2008 1:41 PM PDT

One thing that's been bugging me re-reading these old threads is that the video embedding still works in them, but we still don't have it on LL 2.0. Is there good a reason why this is so?

Please correct the following items:

Please correct the following items:

Your FanPost must be at least 75 words long. Right now it's only 41 words long.

Your FanPost must be at least 75 words long. Right now it's only 41 words long.

Tweet Comment 9 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

The new format wants us to be unhappy

by Graham MacAree on Apr 17, 2008 1:45 PM PDT reply actions

I kind of prefer it this way

some people get way too into posting YouTubes.

by Jeff Sullivan on Apr 17, 2008 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions

fuck those people

NEEDS MORE BONDS

by JI on Apr 17, 2008 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions

I read this as Vidro embedding.

Vidro embedding sounds like such a hard thing to accovidromplish

by Last Fan Of Jose Lopez on Apr 17, 2008 1:53 PM PDT reply actions

not enough bandwidth.

by sirbrianwilson on Apr 17, 2008 2:02 PM PDT up reply actions

Not if you count his mattress

by Jordan of Boise on Apr 17, 2008 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions

If video embedding doesn't exist

when Field Gulls moves over to 2.0, I am going to be very, very sad.

by BrianL on Apr 17, 2008 2:03 PM PDT reply actions

This is a sad thing from my perspective too

though not as annoying as the slower load times.

by johnbai on Apr 17, 2008 2:47 PM PDT reply actions

Refreshing LL - even the Home Page - causes nearly every one of the computers I use to choke. You know - like when you print something to a laser printer at home, and the lights go dim - that sort of thing. It’s bad enough that MY life is controlled by Jeff. I don’t need my bandwidth and computer taken over…

Ill Ligitamus Non Carberendum

by PositivePaul on Apr 17, 2008 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions