Lackey is out for 3-4 weeks, maybe "until May"
That means both of the Angels' aces will be out for opening day, and in Escobar's case, quite a bit longer (and you never know if Lackey's injury is worse than reported).
Needless to say, good news for the M's. One of many boosts the M's are going to need to have a legit chance at the division title.
0 recs |
29
comments
Comments
You win
by Sportszilla on Mar 15, 2008 11:01 AM PDT 0 recs
We might end up winning this division by default!
by EnglishMariner on Mar 15, 2008 11:42 AM PDT 0 recs
They're the two sweetest words
by JI on
Mar 15, 2008 12:00 PM PDT
up
0 recs
I'm happy
Still, if the injury is serious or ends up nagging him, and if Escobar doesn't come back on schedule... whoooeee. This could be a real fun season. I'm now going to go knock on wood and hope all this doesn't come back to bite our own OD starter in the ass.
by Mere Tantalisers on Mar 15, 2008 11:50 AM PDT 0 recs
Yes, of course
by Graham on
Mar 15, 2008 11:52 AM PDT
up
0 recs
It leaves the Angels with a passable rotation
That, I think, helps us out a great deal.
by Gomez on
Mar 15, 2008 3:00 PM PDT
up
0 recs
A random note, but...
The M's play the Angels on April 11th-13th.
Batista, Bedard, and Felix will be starting. Lackey will most likely still be out, as well as Escobar, so that series will be a nice opportunity to win 2-3 games and start off against the Angels on a positive note.
by redwolf75 on Mar 15, 2008 11:52 AM PDT 0 recs
I projected....
FRI 4/11 = Bedard
SAT 4/12 = Felix
SUN 4/13 = Silva
I bought tickets for FRI hoping to maximize my chances to see Bedard or Felix.
Did I do it wrong? I assumed that JohnnyMac would not skip anyone for the first two weeks at least and that the rotation order would be:
Bedard
Felix
Silva
Washburn
Batista
by Username2 on
Mar 15, 2008 12:47 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Looks right to me
Sponsor of Jamie Burke's baseball-reference page
by MarkE on
Mar 15, 2008 12:51 PM PDT
up
0 recs
No, you're right. I forgot that opening day was
by redwolf75 on
Mar 15, 2008 12:56 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Silva
by Mere Tantalisers on
Mar 15, 2008 1:26 PM PDT
up
0 recs
This is why we play the games.
How many people does that piss off? Show of hands?
by Librocrat on Mar 15, 2008 12:41 PM PDT 0 recs
You guys need to take advantage
by rfloh on Mar 15, 2008 12:46 PM PDT 0 recs
Why Don't You Guys Sign Him?
Personally, I don't want the Mariners having anything to do with Bonds. It's too much of a distraction, and I just plain don't like the guy at all because he refuses to put his name on any video game and I have to do it manually.
by TheMarinator on
Mar 15, 2008 12:52 PM PDT
up
0 recs
The season is already a loss for the A's
Bonds, offensively, was roughly 30 runs better than Vidro last year.
by rfloh on
Mar 15, 2008 1:33 PM PDT
up
0 recs
you seem to pay close enough
by Mere Tantalisers on
Mar 15, 2008 1:35 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Well, I'm not speculating
Also, I'm getting pissed off constantly reading all over the web that the Mariners are overrated, pythag, pythag, pythag !!11!!
by rfloh on
Mar 16, 2008 12:24 AM PDT
up
0 recs
What pisses me off about the pythag, pythag
by rfloh on
Mar 17, 2008 4:06 PM PDT
up
0 recs
Ho and Weaver were sufficiently bad
by Llewdor on
Mar 18, 2008 9:40 AM PDT
up
0 recs
Time to rename their 1-2
The 1-2 sugarless, cholesterol free, no calorie, no caffiene, tasteless punch
by TheMarinator on Mar 15, 2008 12:49 PM PDT 0 recs
Now if only Guerrero would...
by vkut79 on Mar 15, 2008 1:47 PM PDT 0 recs
Man, if we had Bonds
by johnbai on Mar 15, 2008 9:06 PM PDT 0 recs







