Jake Peavy Is Smart
There are a bunch of different ways for a player on the market to be self-serving. Jake Peavy is trying a new one:
Politics makes strange bedfellows and so does Jake Peavy's no-trade clause, which is why the Padres ace and his agent Thursday were discussing Braves shortstop Yunel Escobar and their preference that he remain with the Braves if Peavy is sent to Atlanta.
Escobar is a good ballplayer whom the Padres have gleaned might be theirs as part of a package deal for Peavy.
...
“Escobar's a pretty good player,” [agent] Axelrod said. “To be honest, Jake and I have said, 'If that kind of trade gets made, who plays short for them?'”
...
“One of the things we will want to look at some point is, 'Who are you giving up? How much are you weakening your team to make this deal?'” Axelrod said. “If Team X trades three starting pitchers and a starting shortstop to get Jake Peavy, that lessens their chance of being a successful team.”
It's both a selfless gesture and a selfish gesture at the same time - Peavy doesn't want a trade to do too much damage to his new team, but in so doing he's also serving his own interests and making things more difficult for his current employer. It's interesting is what it is, and while I'm sure this sort of thing passes through every player's mind in any given trade, how many of them really think that hard about it? If more players didn't want to hurt their new teams, wouldn't we, say, see a few more bargain free agent contracts? Maybe this is one of the luxuries of having a no-trade clause. I don't know.
What's most important here is that, while I'm sure Peavy is thinking about this differently, he and his agent have arrived at the right conclusion. Yunel Escobar is a hell of a player. At the very least, he is, on his own, nearly as valuable as Peavy is, and depending on how you weight Peavy's 2008, Escobar may even be better. So if Peavy wants to get traded to a contender, it works against his own desires for that contender to give up a package of approximate or superior value. That's not going to help Peavy get to where he wants to go.
Shortstops who can hit the ball and play the field. They do exist. And they're freaking awesome. I don't know if Towers'll be able to pry Escobar away from the Braves with Peavy's consent in the end, but even if he can't, he's got the right idea. Aces are overrated.
Comments
If I'm a Padres fan, I'm not liking Jake Peavy right now.
by Goose on
Nov 7, 2008 6:54 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Good thing there aren't any Padre fans.
by Matthew on
Nov 7, 2008 7:05 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Whoa, hey... Padres fan here
Alot of Padres fans are pissed at Peavy right now, but you’d have to know the whole story to form an opinion of your own.
You guys know the drill, lose close to 100 games and heads are going to roll. On top of that our club is dealing with an ownership divorce that has everything up in the air :( The one thing that we do know is that payroll will be cut, with a low end figure of about 40 mil. Ouch.
It’s full on rebuilding mode in SD and Jake, having signed a contract with a team that he thought would contend for years to come, would be just as happy to provide his services to another team…
“Aces are overrated.” …does that statement have anything to do with Bedard?
by The Kipper on
Nov 7, 2008 7:17 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'd be more pissed about Vasgersian leaving
by JI on
Nov 7, 2008 7:44 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Seriously
I actually heard him announce a Seahawks game a couple of years back. Solid dude.
by The Kipper on
Nov 7, 2008 7:48 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Also Jake Peavy's mechanics are a ticking time bomb
by Graham on
Nov 7, 2008 8:10 PM PST
reply
actions
2 recs
IIRC - Griffey took much the same stance when he "asked" to be traded ...
I remember Griffery or Goldberg saying that Griffery would decline a deal if they felt the Reds were surrendering too much value trading for him.
Just another example of how Griffey gets a free pass from many fans for blatant selfishness that eclipses anything displayed by A-Rod.
by Steve Nelson on
Nov 7, 2008 8:52 PM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
It's stupid, yes, but Griffey was 10 times more loved than A-Rod ever was or could be
by seattlebruin on
Nov 7, 2008 8:54 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Classy Gesture". One of my favorite Griffey memories, when he was still The Kid.
“Griffey said he’d be willing to defer as much as $6 million of the $14 million he has coming in the 1994-95 seasons to help owners fashion new contracts and avoid trading the trio (Randy Johnson, Dave Valle, Jay Buhner). ”http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19931004&slug=1724294" >Link.
by dpseadv on
Nov 8, 2008 2:00 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ok, that was supposed to be in italics, and I have no excuses for the link.
Link attempt #2.
by dpseadv on
Nov 8, 2008 2:02 AM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
YES!
I was put in charge of our Padres website for a few hours today while the boss was gone, so I was following this closely to see if any news broke. And I was amazed. I was both pissed and impressed, because I honestly can’t remember this happening before.
My first thought: “What a dick! He’s not a GM, and he has no business being involved!”
My second thought: “That’s actually pretty smart.”
My third thought: " Well, that’s what you get for giving a guy a full no-trade clause."
Overall, my take: Peavy signed a below-market contract because he, for some reason, thought the Padres were in good shape. He gave up free agency to play for the San Diego Padres. He dug his own grave, and if he’s not careful, he’s going to have to stay with this awful team. But Towers also dug this hole, so he can’t really complain.
Fascinating.
by Teej on
Nov 8, 2008 12:32 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
"if he's not careful, he's going to have to stay with this awful team."
Is that really possible, if the payroll is going to be 40 million?
by Rick B on
Nov 9, 2008 5:55 AM PST
reply
actions
0 recs
Sure, they could keep him for another year. He's only owed $8 million next year.
The chances of that happening are virtually nil, though. Sounds like a trade’s going to happen one way or another.
by Teej on
Nov 9, 2008 3:01 PM PST
up
reply
actions
0 recs







