consider trading Johjima?
Just a thought, but with the M's unlikely to be good in the next couple of years, why should they hold on to Kenji Johjima and his 3/24 contract? instead of playing Jeff Clement there?
I mean Johjima was hit by bad luck this year so there is the problem of his trade value, but even then, him blocking Clement is almost as bad. while he's likely a better short term player than Clement . by the time the M's are ready to contend again he's probably not there anymore.
There's a few team that's pretty darn desperate for a catcher, the new M's FO would do well to try and fleece someone with Johjima. Boston? Detroit? either NY team?
0 recs |
69 comments
Comments
The only problem is
desperate doesn’t always mean stupid. Pretty sure they’d have a hard time “fleecing” Boston with Johjima, and NY’s not exactly beating down Z’s door with trade offers.
Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.
by pdb on Nov 19, 2008 9:16 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
It's a great idea except for the part where Johjima is untradable .
Furcal
by JI on Nov 19, 2008 9:22 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
If the Mariners paid for his I'd consider trading for him.
by Robert on Nov 19, 2008 10:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I mean personally.
I need a new butler.
by Robert on Nov 19, 2008 10:55 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Alfred. He ironed Robert's costume every night, and kept his alter ego secret.
Screw you, Mariners. I'm back in football's loving arms. *edit: well, shit. This isn't going well.
by kevin_ess on Nov 20, 2008 7:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Which one?
Screw you, Mariners. I'm back in football's loving arms. *edit: well, shit. This isn't going well.
by kevin_ess on Nov 20, 2008 8:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
well
there are always creative ideas…
say… strait up for Hideki Matsui?
Matsui’s owed a bit more per year but it’s only 1 year, M’s need a DH .. sure this is sort of a dump deal. I guess if anyone takes Kei Igawa from the Yanks they’d be willing to throw in a prospect just to get rid of him though lol.
Boston is tougher to match up with, as their worse contract is Lugo, who has a even worse contract than Johjima and doesn’t fill the M’s need .
in a off season where Jason fucking Varitek is asking for 4/52, I’m sure you can find SOMEWAY to trade Johjima. if not the best way ever.
by RollingWave on Nov 19, 2008 9:29 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
You'd be lucky to get a bag of marshmallows for Joh.
I have eight watches. None of them are fake.
by RafaelCarmona22 on Nov 19, 2008 9:35 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
If Boston's front office were stupid/completely devoid of scouting resources they might take a chance on Johjima
but honestly, do you think that an org that’s renowned for using pretty advanced metrics to find/rate players is going to all of a sudden go “well, crap, we’re desperate, why not?” for anybody? Don’t think so.
Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.
by pdb on Nov 19, 2008 9:46 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Jason Varitek's poor year at the plate was the difference in the Red Sox not making it to the World Series.
GREINKE HO!!!!!
by oc on Nov 23, 2008 4:16 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Even if it was, Johjima wasn't any better.
He’s not an upgrade.
by MrIncognito on Nov 24, 2008 7:41 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why would the Yankees trade someone who is only a marginal problem for a huge problem contract
when they already have Jorge Posada?
If anyone would take Johjima’s salary off our hands for free, I’d do it.
by seattlebruin on Nov 20, 2008 8:10 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd be happy to take Johjima's salary please
but you can keep the Johjima it came with.
Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.
by pdb on Nov 20, 2008 8:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
By
Desperate means lack of sound alternatives. surely gambling on Johjima is a better idea then giving 4/52 to Varitek or playing a journyman backup there. or even guys like Josh Bard and Michael Barrett.
It depends a bit on what the M’s are willing to take in return, but it’s hard to say that unless one think Johjima 08 is the real Johjima going foward instead of 06/07 that there’s no chance for him to get traded.
by RollingWave on Nov 19, 2008 10:15 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Johjima is under contract for three years
No one is gambling on him.
Furcal
by JI on Nov 19, 2008 10:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Boston would never give Varitek 4/52. And why are you pulling this kind of number out of your ass?
Look, we get it. Everyone would like to trade Johjima, but it’s not going to happen. We realized we were screwed the moment Bavasi extended him. Joh will be a fine platoon catcher as Clement continues to sharpen his skills. That’s about the best thing we can hope for and making a trade suggestion isn’t going to change a thing.
by Wilder. on Nov 20, 2008 9:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This.
RollingWave, repeat after me, again: BOSTON IS NOT STUPID. Nobody’s going to give Varitek 4/52 at this point. Unless by “52” you mean 52,000.
Don’t assume that other players want the M’s junk just because we don’t.
Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.
by pdb on Nov 20, 2008 9:59 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why do you think anyone would want Joh?
I’m interested to see your argument that he is better than any team’s other options (over the next 3 years and not just 2009).
by Edgar for Pres on Nov 19, 2008 11:04 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Why do you think anyone would want Joh?
I’m interested to see your argument that he is better than any team’s other options (over the next 3 years and not just 2009).
by Edgar for Pres on Nov 19, 2008 11:06 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Why do you think anyone would want Joh?
I’m interested to see your argument that he is better than any team’s other options (over the next 3 years and not just 2009).
by Robert on Nov 19, 2008 11:35 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Why do you think anyone would want Joh?
I’m interested to see your argument that he is better than any team’s other options (over the next 3 years and not just 2009).
Furcal
by JI on Nov 19, 2008 11:48 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Why do you think anyone would want Joh?
I’m interested to see your argument that he is better than any team’s other options (over the next 3 years and not just 2009).
Determined, Jonesing Commentor | Proud proprietor of Washingtonhighways.org
by I'm NOT Corco on Nov 19, 2008 11:50 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
At first I thought I made a decent comment and you guys were just copying me for fun
but really I’m just retarded and can’t post things correctly.
by Edgar for Pres on Nov 20, 2008 12:33 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
¿Por qué piensas alguien quiere Johjima?
Quiero recibir su razonamiento porqué Joh es el opción mejor para cualquie equipo (por los tres años próximos, no solamente 2009).
by Gomez on Nov 20, 2008 11:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Chimichanga.
Screw you, Mariners. I'm back in football's loving arms. *edit: well, shit. This isn't going well.
by kevin_ess on Nov 20, 2008 12:50 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My argument
is that the catcher market works differently than most other markets, there are only very very few truely elite catchers, and very very few reasonablly decent onces, and a lot of really really really bad onces. if you have a one of the elite guys or even the half decent onces (like say Navarro, Shoppach), its’ an amazing advantage.
There are essentially 3.5 truely elite catcher now, Mauer, Mccane, Martin, and maybe Soto (need more time to be sure) a few decent onces or good but old/injury prone or other issue like not being able to throw anyone out guys like Navvaro, Shoppach, Napoli, B-Molina and that’s bout it (Posada’s old/injured, V-Mart sucks at catching and Varitke is old and sucky ) amoung other guys, some might put up half decent years while sucking badly at others (Liard, Barrett, Bard, Buck etc…), or consistently below average (AJ Peirzynski) while many other just flat out suck.
notice how the first two group consist mostly of guys that will not see FA in ages if ever? the guy closet to seeing FA (B-Molina) also happens to be old and obviously declining soon if not now.
So the question begs that what Johjima is going foward? age is a obvious issue I guess, but other wise it’s hard to see him not bouncing back to at least some semblence of AJ Pierzynski level hitting at least with a better glove. AJP is due 6.25M in the next two years also, so the money difference seems minimal.
Honestly, if your a contender with at least some cash to spend or a bad contract to swap, I don’t see how Johjima is a bad idea unless i’m unaware of something physically wrong with him.
From the M’s perspective, they probably shouldn’t play him going foward anyway, seeing how developing Clement should be a priority regardless of either players’ performance. in that case, getting him for ANYTHING with even minimal value should be better off than the current situation.
Just look at the FA catcher list for the next two season should give a better idea.
Rod Barajas TOR
Henry Blanco * CHC
Johnny Estrada WAS
Toby Hall * CWS
Adam Melhuse TEX
Mike Redmond* MIN
Ivan Rodriguez NYY
David Ross BOS
Javier Valentin CIN
Jason Varitek BOS
Vance Wilson DET
Gregg Zaun* TOR
2010
Josh Bard SD
Henry Blanco CHC
Ramon Castro NYM
Ramon Hernandez * BAL
Jason Kendall MIL
Victor Martinez * CLE
Benji Molina SF
Jose Molina NYY
Miguel Olivo KC
David Ross CIN
Brian Schneider NYM
Yorvit Torrealba * COL
The few decent guys in there are all way past their prime, everyone else you could make a very sound case for them of being a backup if they aren’t already.
by RollingWave on Nov 20, 2008 12:39 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
You're not familiar with the concept of freely available talent, are you?
by acblue on Nov 20, 2008 12:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Thank God someone is awake.
Man do I love midgets.
by Thingray on Nov 20, 2008 12:55 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
except that
we’re not talking about relievers or first basemen or corner outfielders. finding free talent for catcher is a lot harder and when you fail the hole your staring at are guys hitting like pitchers.
by RollingWave on Nov 20, 2008 1:17 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll play catcher!
For league minimum.
by brayden04 on Nov 20, 2008 1:57 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Who doesn't want a seven foot tall golem behind the plate?
Screw you, Mariners. I'm back in football's loving arms. *edit: well, shit. This isn't going well.
by kevin_ess on Nov 20, 2008 7:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd be like the catching Richie Sexson.
Except worse at hitting. And fielding. And possibly baserunning. Less douchey. Without the drunk driving.
by brayden04 on Nov 20, 2008 7:45 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Where's the fun in that?
Screw you, Mariners. I'm back in football's loving arms. *edit: well, shit. This isn't going well.
by kevin_ess on Nov 20, 2008 8:14 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, I agree with RollingWave here
it’s a lot harder to find a freely available catcher with a decent glove than a freely available first baseman, unless you’re counting internally developed guys (cough Rob Johnson *cough*)
by seattlebruin on Nov 20, 2008 8:13 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Adam Moore's about 1-2 years away
and more are on their way up the system
by Gomez on Nov 20, 2008 11:50 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This is assuming Clement will be good enough behind the plate.
Which he hasn’t shown to be the case to date.
by brayden04 on Nov 20, 2008 1:00 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
either way
the catcher of the next winning M’s team won’t be Kenji Johjima, we can all agree to that?
by RollingWave on Nov 20, 2008 1:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
You'd be willing to give up talent
in order to win the rights to an over 30 catcher who’s locked up for 3 years and just got out hit by Jose Vidro*?
Wow. That’s a bad idea.
-
-
-
-
*Probably will bounce back a bit going forward, but still.
Furcal
by JI on Nov 20, 2008 1:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It depends on
how much you think he’ll bounce back.
If say… 90-95ish OPS+, and his defense holds, I think 7M isn’t really overpaying .
espically if the deal involve the other team giving back some unwanted contracts as well.
by RollingWave on Nov 20, 2008 1:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
For one year *maybe*, maybe if you 100% certain he'd bounce back
but a three year commitment is batshit insane.
Furcal
by JI on Nov 20, 2008 1:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
so if
say the Yankees come to you with a Kei Igawa for Kenji Johjima deal, you’d take it and run?
by RollingWave on Nov 20, 2008 1:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Johjima is probably useful enough that it isn't worth it to dump him outright to save 9 million dollars
it’s better gamble to see if he can bounce back, if not, oh well it’s a sunken cost.
Furcal
by JI on Nov 20, 2008 1:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
but wouldn't
it make sense to just try out Clement? for better or worse? and if your benching him that’s unliekly to up his trade value
by RollingWave on Nov 20, 2008 1:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Okay, let's go with wOBA+.
Or, more accurately wOBA. Kenji’s wOBA+ last season was 84. His wOBA* was .286. Let’s say Kenji bounces back to a .315 wOBA*. I think that’s highly unlikely, but for the sake of argument. That would have put his wOBA+ this year at around 93. Let’s say he’s +5 as a catcher. I don’t think that’s anywhere close to true, but again, sake or argument. That’s a 1.5 win player next year. On the open market, that’s worth about $7.5MM or so.
That’s next year only. I’m giving his true talent level the benefit of the doubt. He’s 32. No one is going to trade for that when they can pick up a .5 win catcher for jack diddly and spend the rest of the money on something useful.
He’s a sunk cost. Oh well.
by acblue on Nov 20, 2008 1:37 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Johjima is not tradable right now.
The guy had a terrible year and is due to make MORE money the next few years. Anyone who wants him would have to hope that he bounces back big time. Guys like these are available for cheap. Johjima is not cheap.
Hell, it was a miracle that teams were actually interested in trading for Washburn and that was during a stretch looked better than he actually was.
The only team dumb enough to bring in expensive talent in hopes that they bounce back is Bill Bavasi’s Mariners (ie. Jose Vidro).
by ThundaPC on Nov 20, 2008 1:42 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
That would be lovely but as has been pointed out earlier, sadly impossible.
Fuck this stupid extension
by Graham on Nov 20, 2008 7:46 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
It's one of the many souvenirs left by the old regime
y’know, just so we wouldn’t forget them.
Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.
by pdb on Nov 20, 2008 7:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I want Bavasi's head on a pike.
Screw you, Mariners. I'm back in football's loving arms. *edit: well, shit. This isn't going well.
by kevin_ess on Nov 20, 2008 8:15 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I tried but now I just have paper cuts.
by Sec 108 on Nov 20, 2008 8:19 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Short circuit!
Screw you, Mariners. I'm back in football's loving arms. *edit: well, shit. This isn't going well.
by kevin_ess on Nov 20, 2008 9:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















