A Thought
If I may chart my ALCS emotion over the past several days:
Game Five was great. For a while. Then came the comeback, which would probably be called The Comeback were it not for the eventual outcome of the series. My mood started to fall the instant Ortiz left the ballpark, and Drew's home run dropped me below y=0. There I remained for quite a while, as the inevitability of the whole thing began to sink in. While I tried to rationally talk my way out of it, I was convinced that this series would go to the Red Sox. Convinced. I don't know, maybe that was just a defense mechanism. Maybe it was another example of me protecting myself from the worst by expecting it. But whatever was going on, I was unhappy. I got to dwell on the anticipated collapse almost all weekend long, and Pedroia's home run last night hardly did anything to change my mind.
Then the Rays tied it up. Then the Rays took the lead. Then Matt Garza happened and David Price flipped a tizzy and the Rays won the game. I jumped, I screamed, and I leaned forward with my hands over my mouth as I watched my beloved bandwagon team celebrate - I mean really celebrate - for the first time in its history. I spent the rest of the night content and I woke up this morning with a smile.
While the joy derived from watching the Rays defeat the Great Satan has provided a kind of dull happy roar all day, though, I'm not sure it competes with the constant agony and cyclical resignation from earlier in the weekend. Which brings me to my thought. The area of A is significantly greater than the area of B. However, the peak of B is significantly greater in magnitude than the peak of A. And everyone who was pulling for the Rays will tell you that the outcome was absolutely worth all the torture. Obviously.
What this implies, I think, is that we watch sports to experience peaks, and that as long as there's the potential for a peak in the future, it doesn't matter how sustained the dejection might be in the present, because we reassure ourselves with the knowledge that eventually there will come a point at which everything becomes worthwhile. And there's always the potential for that peak in the future. Always. Because nobody knows what's going to happen.
Sustained happiness sounds nice and all, but that isn't what we want. Not at the heart of the matter. What we want is to experience enough sudden, fleeting highs to make up for the long, ugly lows. And those highs are so powerful that even the mere thought of them is enough to pull us through the darkest of days. Because we're convinced that all of that darkness may be undone by fifteen minutes of spectacular, shimmering light.
The Seattle Mariners suck. I'll never be able to quit them.
4 recs |
61 comments
Comments
Good write up like always.
I’m with the M’s till the end.
BOOYA! You got Slurved!
by Slurvey on Oct 20, 2008 7:36 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I think you need a delta function in there.
Children, until we have taught them better, will be perfectly happy with a seasonal round of games in which conkers succeeds hopscotch.
by salb918 on Oct 20, 2008 8:18 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Boston isn't the Great Satan
That title belongs to the Yankees. Boston is more like the Minor Satan.
by EmsFan on Oct 20, 2008 8:22 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Boston's fans perhaps.
As a team, I would say the Angels or the Yankees are a higher Satan.
by batura on Oct 20, 2008 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
2nded
This signature space for rent.
by PositivePaul on Oct 21, 2008 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have never thought about it this way
But it is so true
by Fett42 on Oct 20, 2008 8:26 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The high is always better than any low, no matter how low it is
I assume that’s how it works for drug addicts, and the M’s sure make me feel like a heroin junkie. Completely down and depressed while on or off, but willing to do anything to be on because sometimes, just sometimes, I feel like a million bucks when they’re really on
HA HA HA, your Grandpa's an ASS!- Tourette's Guy (R.I.P)
by tootthekazoo on Oct 20, 2008 8:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly what I was thinking except
I thought of cocaine rather than heroin, due to the spike of high and the long depression afterwards.
Then I thought… I hate cocaine… and really dislike being around it or people who are on it. Hmm… What does that say about my sports interest.
by johnbai on Oct 22, 2008 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
This graph demonstrates why I really dislike the playoff schedule.
"Sorry I hit you in the helmet Hank, I meant to hit you in the neck." Stan Williams to Hank Aaron.
by dpseadv on Oct 20, 2008 8:48 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I need the new GM announcement to sustain my high
by JLC on Oct 20, 2008 10:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I heard it will be Brian Sabean
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on Oct 20, 2008 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
You sir
are a phenomenal writer.
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on Oct 20, 2008 10:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The Seattle Mariners suck. I'll never be able to quit them.
How mortifyingly true.
On Tampa, Dave from USSM wrote: “Their version of 1995 has just gone a step beyond our own.”
I think I get the LL-Tampa fetish now. A little.
by lemonverbena on Oct 21, 2008 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
90% of the LL-Tampa fetish is because Jeff/Matthew told them to.
by Robert on Oct 21, 2008 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like I wouldn't have rooted for the Rays regardless
by JI on Oct 21, 2008 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the support you guys
There is enough hate in the world it is nice to see a little love.
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on Oct 21, 2008 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also, atta way to go boy
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind.
by Sandy Kazmir on Oct 21, 2008 12:11 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I will admit that Jeff's offseason post on the Rays was a huge factor in my going from Devil Rays sympathizer to Rays bandwagoner.
And once it became apparent that the M’s were done for, I needed a team to pull for. The Rays are fun to watch, they play in a division with two of my least favorite teams, and their success is good for baseball. So am I a bandwagoner? Sure. Did J/M/G’s pimping of the Rays help to further said bandwagoning? Yeah, probably. Do I really give a shit? No.
The Rays made this season fun, and I have another team to root for in the future. If that makes me an LLemming, I’m okay with that.
J.K.L.
by acblue on Oct 21, 2008 1:15 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well said, friend.
Sometimes I have a hard time explaining to my lady why I allow myself to get so worked up over stuff like this. And this weekend, I was a mess. She seriously hid from me because of the random, illogical (to her) threats I was making on Buck Martinez’s life every few minutes.
Sending her the link to this right now . . .
by Teej on Oct 20, 2008 10:51 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If your lady asks why do you need a team to win...that has little importance on your life...
…just tell her, you dont see why you cant have that win, especially since its ‘no big deal’ as she claims.
I mean, its no big deal right? THEN WHY CANT WE HAVE IT?! We’re not asking to end world hunger here.
by Slica on Oct 21, 2008 12:38 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And let us not forget that there was a lot more B than A during the first four games.
Which would have only made the suffering more drastic had they lost, but still, Games 2, 3 and 4 were amazingly fun.
Jesus, what a series!
by Teej on Oct 20, 2008 10:55 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
So apparently BJ Upton and Evan Longoria are both very good
by seattlebruin on Oct 21, 2008 6:42 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
They're not old enough to be good, but they have potential.
by Teej on Oct 21, 2008 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If they're older than me, they're old enough
by seattlebruin on Oct 21, 2008 2:47 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
And now I realize that Evan Longoria is not older than me
by seattlebruin on Oct 21, 2008 2:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Evan Longoria was born in my sophomore year of high school.
I believe that is in fact my lawn you’re standing on.
Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.
by pdb on Oct 21, 2008 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, there was
but we would’ve kept watching, even if there hadn’t been. I’m more using this series to consider a general rule.
by Jeff on Oct 21, 2008 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Your happy zone resembles a middle finger.
Hard work never killed nobody, but I won't take my chances.
by JAH on Oct 21, 2008 4:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
PEAK-END RULE
Yo Jeff, Im a psychology graduate student, and think you may want to look up “peak-end” rule. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak-end_rule Check that out. Its short and sweet. It may have something to say about the way you feel.
by sadfaceMsFan on Oct 21, 2008 5:55 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
you're a special snowflake
Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.
by pdb on Oct 21, 2008 10:07 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are there any more sources?
That’s not a well-cited entry.
by Matthew on Oct 21, 2008 10:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
you don't believe Wikipedia?
why do you hate America?
Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.
by pdb on Oct 21, 2008 10:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because America believes Wikipedia.
Actually, I was just hoping for further reading. It’s an interesting idea, but I’m never going to just take one source as canon.
by Matthew on Oct 21, 2008 10:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clicking on the provided link for Daniel Kahneman
reveals that he was a psychologist who specialized in something called Behavioral Economics and later Hedonic Psychology, which is described as
“the study of what makes experiences and life pleasant or unpleasant. It is concerned with feelings of pleasure and pain, of interest and boredom, of joy and sorrow, and of satisfaction and dissatisfaction.”
The Peak-End rule would seem a likely component of these fields of study. And the Wikipedia page for Dr. Kahneman has links to various sources and other theories he’s credited with.
by johnbai on Oct 22, 2008 10:58 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
ok so i cited wikipedia because I thought it would offer a concise explanation....
…but for you doubters….
Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, D.L., Schreiber , C.A. , & Redelemeier, D.A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4 , 401-405.
This is actually a well replicated finding supported by a ton of lit, and put forth by our (Princeton’s) own Danny Kahneman (who won a Nobel prize). Its legit, and really cool.
by sadfaceMsFan on Oct 21, 2008 10:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Do us a favor and use the reply button in the future
It makes following the conversation a lot easier for everyone. Thanks for the citation – it’s an interesting subject.
by Jeff on Oct 21, 2008 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 













