StatCorner 1.0

by Matthew on Oct 11, 2008 9:23 PM PDT in Seattle Mariners Stats

Hey all, just a quick note to let you know that we're out of Beta (in just 58 days, take that Google!).

Some brief highlights:

New presentation, with a little less harsh green and including an actual logo
Minor league data from 2007 and 2008. Please note that we do not (yet) have park factor information for minor leagues and we do not (and never will have) pitch by pitch data for A, A+, or AA leagues.
tRA*
A somewhat enhanced glossary look up and team selection widget for hopefully easier navigation around the site.
Player search now includes the latest team for the player to help distinguish between all those Hernandez's and Young's.

There's still tons more to come and, as always, feedback's always welcome. Thanks.

StatCorner 1.0

Tweet Comment 51 comments | 3 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

:)

This makes me happy.

I like homeless people. They are funny. I like cake. It is not funny but really delicious.

by Humongo on Oct 11, 2008 9:58 PM PDT reply actions

Just made this comment in the Rays thread, but it deserves repeating:

You guys rock. For how young it is, the site is stellar.

by Teej on Oct 11, 2008 10:04 PM PDT reply actions

If you could have a easy way of organizing ML affiliations with the MLB club that would be great.

And A FF plugin would be nice

by Robert on Oct 11, 2008 10:05 PM PDT reply actions

Dude, quick search.

by Matthew on Oct 11, 2008 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions

Just saying not everyone knows how to do quick search

Still excellent work

by Robert on Oct 11, 2008 10:09 PM PDT up reply actions

I looked into making a FF plugin

when you first brought it up, it seemed like too much work. I’ll give it another search though.

by Matthew on Oct 11, 2008 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions

The one thing that FF has over a QS

Is the fact that we could highlight than right click names that would normally be hard to spell

by Robert on Oct 11, 2008 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions

testing

FF plugin link

Let me know if this works.

by Matthew on Oct 11, 2008 10:40 PM PDT up reply actions

Ok, it seems to work

and has been added at the bottom of the stats page

Here

by Matthew on Oct 11, 2008 10:55 PM PDT up reply actions

Awesome.

by Goose on Oct 12, 2008 8:21 AM PDT up reply actions

I wouldn't mind seeing the teams organized more like baseball ref's

ie, regulars separated from backups, starters separated from relievers.

But, as said in the GT, the redesign looks very nice. Well done.

9=8

by JI on Oct 11, 2008 10:05 PM PDT reply actions

I don't understand.

SP and RP are insanely seperated

by Matthew on Oct 11, 2008 10:07 PM PDT up reply actions

There's nothing I can say here that won't make me look less stupid.

9=8

by JI on Oct 11, 2008 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions

I think Miles' name threw me off...

9=8

by JI on Oct 11, 2008 10:11 PM PDT up reply actions

I make a badass amateur graphics designer huh?

by Graham MacAree on Oct 11, 2008 11:22 PM PDT up reply actions

Not enough comic fonts or flashing graphics.

Nice Guys Finish Third - Hopelessly lost, but makin' good time.

by pdb on Oct 11, 2008 11:32 PM PDT up reply actions

Like you need my praise.

9=8

by JI on Oct 12, 2008 12:24 AM PDT up reply actions

As though you didn't receive amateur feedback throughout the process.

by Kirsten Schlewitz on Oct 12, 2008 5:35 AM PDT up reply actions

Amazingly, Robert's I HATE THIS CHANGE IT ALL

Was the most useful

by Graham MacAree on Oct 12, 2008 8:11 AM PDT up reply actions

I just liked being given the opportunity to complain about things on a daily basis.

by Robert on Oct 12, 2008 8:18 AM PDT up reply actions

The new look, and less of that horrible HTML green

is a great thing.

by johnbai on Oct 13, 2008 10:01 AM PDT up reply actions

I helped damn it.

by Kirsten Schlewitz on Oct 13, 2008 10:53 AM PDT up reply actions

You loved the horrible HTML green.

by JI on Oct 13, 2008 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions

As long as you’re taking feedback – from a purely aesthetic perspective I think the logo would look much better with the alpha and taus in whatever font you use for the rest of it. The sigma fits in with the angularity and austerity of the font (what is that – it looks like the New Yorker) whereas the other letters are too rounded and don’t fit size-wise, making it seem strained. Just my $0.02.

Also, it seems intuitive to me that the underlines “AL” and “NL” over the team names on the front page should link directly to the pitching leaderboards for those leagues.

If the suggestions seem trivial its because the site is otherwise perfect ;)

by Bearskin Rugburn on Oct 11, 2008 11:09 PM PDT reply actions