Uh-ohs for Miguel Tejada
According to this, Congressman Henry Waxman and staff don't think Miguel Tejada was on the up-and-up when interviewed for Steroids: The Hearing Episode 1. Tejada claimed utter ignorance; Mitchell says he's seen checks written by Miggy to Adam Piatt for PED's. Piatt independantly fingered Tejada as well, but the checks are harder evidence.
You can face time for lying in an investigation even if you are not under oath. Just ask Martha Stewart.
And if you are wondering why Palmiero gets a pass, my understanding is that they can't prove that he had used steroids prior to his testimony in Congress.
59 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
My favorite passage so far:
"Most ominous words of the day: Rep. Stephen Lynch suggested Congress might want to do its own version of the Mitchell investigation -- except that investigation would pack the power of subpoenas "and possible criminal charges."
Mitchell then reminded Lynch that it has long been "the policy of the United States Government" to target dealers, distributors and manufacturers of illegal drugs -- not individual users.
But Lynch didn't back off, even an inch.
"These are adults," he said, who are "deciding to use drugs because it provides ... a distinct monetary advantage." These are not innocent kids being preyed on by sinister drug dealers, Lynch said.
Don't dismiss the danger in those words. If Congress decides to launch its own investigation, it will make the Mitchell report look like a high school term paper."
<insert requisite comment
It's an election year
it begs the question;
No way. The 1962 Congress was way worse!
by MarinerintheDistrict on Jan 15, 2008 10:45 AM PST up reply actions
IF THE DEMOC-RATS STOP BEING CRY
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jan 15, 2008 10:46 AM PST up reply actions
Wow
The administation prefers the term 'surge'
Step away from the Vicodin, Mr. O'Reilly.
I'LL KICK YOU
by Bearskin Rugburn on Jan 15, 2008 11:31 AM PST up reply actions
The Pita?
...Is okay.
No kidding
I wasn't so fond of 1994-2006.
Not a big Rush fan eh?
by MarinerintheDistrict on Jan 15, 2008 10:51 AM PST up reply actions
I've been known to not be fond of him.
Don't know about ever
Talking about irrelevant actions and such, I'd say the "Impeach Clinton" Congress was pretty bad; that whole Congress seemed to exist to do nothing but dig up meaningless dirt on a pointless diversion, and it wasted a ton of time and tax money doing so.
But that's just recent history; I need to look further in the past tonight to see which ones were worse.
As much as I hated that congress
Their goal was to turn Bill into a lame duck and they accomplished that. Their second goal was to line their pockets while everyone was distracted by a semen-stained dress... and they accomplished that as well.
Good point.
Touche'
It's not the worst
Which is pretty messed up
Not really surprising though
by Graham MacAree on Jan 15, 2008 12:41 PM PST up reply actions
It's not a surprise at all
They should market it like Axe Body Spray.
For you:
Wow, that's, uh,
Too soon.
Picture subtitle:
Bom Chicka Wah Wah.
They need endorsement deals
i couldve sworn
Yeah, but they don't do enough
under armor and ihop would be better
Nobody can tell me
mine did
Don't get me wrong
Jeez, no kidding...
//German major, wtf????
by PositivePaul on Jan 15, 2008 1:19 PM PST up reply actions
indeed, Juvenal Satire X
Be honest, now
I'm not criticizing, I'm just wondering.
Remembered
OK, Juvenal isn't 'history' per se, but it's a pretty damned famous quote.
Impressive
Which is why I usually keep my mouth shut when it comes to stuff like that unless I have an encyclopedia or the Internet handy.
That's all he's got
Not that he cares, but sometimes it's easier to remember things like that; where there's only one possible question. It's not like people are going to ask how his satires compare with Horace or something.
To bring this back: who's the guy who hit two grand slams in one inning?
Easy, right? And it's because he never became much of anything. He had a nice year, he had a disappointing but not too short career, but that's all that anyone will ever ask about Fernando Tatis - and that's what makes it easy to remember.

by 









