Jose Guillen extension hits snag
FoxSports had a blurbed:
"The Mariners' negotiations with right fielder Jose Guillen sputtered due to the after-effects of the Diamondbacks' signing of outfielder Eric Byrnes to a three-year, $30 million contract. Guillen can make a case that he deserves to be paid more than Byrnes. Starting in 2004, he has 79 homers and 304 RBIs, compared to Byrnes' 77 homers and 272 RBIs. Guillen, 31, is three months younger than Byrnes. While he has a history of volatility, he has been on good behavior this season."
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
heh
I hope it doesn't get done.
I'd go for two years, but yeah
by chrisisasavage on Sep 7, 2007 10:16 AM PDT up reply actions
Ugh
Think about what you just posted
I won't shed any tears if it doesn't go down
I was cool with the deal at first but I was also thinking it'd be $8-10 million per. If Guillen's gonna want 3/36 or something, then forget it.
Weighing your value against overpaid players is a fallacy, and such people aren't worth negotiating with.
Jose can opt out of the option
# $1M signing bonus
# 07:$4M, 08:$9M club option ($0.5M buyout)
# if club exercises 2008 option, Guillen may void & forfeit buyout
# if club does not exercise 2008 option, Guillen may exercise 2008 option for $5M, and club may void & pay buyout
# performance bonuses for 2007 and 2008 if player exercises option:
* $0.125M 300 PAs, $0.25M each 350, 400, 450, 500 & 550 PAs
* for GS at any position other than DH: $0.125M for 90 GS, $0.25M each for 100, 110, 120, 130 & 140 GS
# award bonuses: $0.15M for MVP, $0.1M for WS MVP, $50,000 each for Gold Glove, Silver Slugger, LCS MVP or All Star ($25,000 for selection)
No DH-ing
by IchirosTalkingDog on Sep 7, 2007 2:51 PM PDT up reply actions
That's more of an injury thing
Guillen's not the best outfielder on the planet, but we have other morons to chuck to the DH role right now anyway.
by TIF @ Lookout Landing on Sep 7, 2007 3:04 PM PDT up reply actions
Oops! sorry!
Great contract breakdown eknpdx!
Guillen does pose a small 'problem'; the type every team can dream of. Too many good outfielders, of course, its been said a hundred times, but the FO WILL need to do something about it. There shouldn't be any doubt in ANYone's mind what this org is going to do:EXTEND his Veteran'ness. That's what we do. Pay them waaay to long. The kids never really get a chance unless they're KGJ or DARO. The org clearly loves to set up retirement plans for certain players, and then sit back and watch said player suck until there's really no respect left in either player or fan. Then only 2 years left in the contract..YIPPEE!!
I don't think Guillen will suck for the next few years, he will be a productive MLB'er, if healthy. If Guillen is truely happy here then he'll let us take the option, and next year around July, decide whether to extend him or flip his ass for and old pickle, a bag of potatoes, and Rick White, cos we'll need him down the stretch. I love this home for MLB expression...ahhh, if only our team could provide something WORTH writing/reading.
You know
If we lose Guillen
Vidro isn't going anywhere at DH, and I doubt that Raul becomes a first baseman, and with his second half he's not getting booted from the team, so I expect next years outfield will be Raul Ichiro Guillen/Jones.
by MfaninAlaska on Sep 7, 2007 12:33 PM PDT up reply actions
I think there are better then 50% odds
by Jeff Sullivan on Sep 7, 2007 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions
That was my assumption
Surely the Ms arent that stupid...are th---oh wait.
Hmm...
I agree it will be the Giants
I've got a dollar that says he stays.
Hellllllllllllllllllo:
Goooooooooooooooooodbye: Ben Broussard
Not that 1B defense can get much worse
well you're taking away the one thing Richie
Ummm...
he has a longer reach
I'm 100% on the WLAD bandwagon.
Then again, I've always felt that Guillen was overrated around here, but I think I'm the only one. I never understood why they wanted to go with a RH hitter in RF. They should have stuck a lefty in there and let him take advantage of Safeco.

by 










