Interesting trades/signing ideas, but unlikely
It seems like the M's are the frontrunner for Erik Bedard. So if we trade Adam Jones, George Sherrill, and someone else. Then we sign Fukodome (i dunno if thats spelled right) and he plays right field. (But it looks more like he will go to the padres or cubs.) How does that sound? I'm semi interested in it, because I believe Fukodome would be pretty good in our lineup. But I don't wanna lose AJ because he is 21 or 22. So he can still become really good.
We could also deal Ibanez to the Cubs....for some sort of pitching. Maybe the often injured Mark Prior.
76 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Prior is likely not going
If we trade Jones for Bedard
He is 34,
Does anyone know if Ichiro would want to move back to RF? He seemed to enjoy being in CF.
Nick Green
That ends his Mariners story.
And what a story it was!
Noooooooooo
Fukudome is going to get insane $
I'm still gonna keep on chirping bout Andre Ethier
Per rotoworld (who i have very little faith in), "The Dodgers have expressed interest in Joaquin Benoit in the past and could have a fit there, though they'd probably want more." So that to me says Sherril and somebody interesting but not good in the minors.
I'm doubting more and more that the Bedard trade
Joba Chamberlain
Is this guy as good as the media say he is, or is it just a case of hype because he plays in Pinstripes and throws hard?
I would say maybe
I also find Jacob Ellsbury incredibly overrated. We'll see. Everything has to go Boston's way, so im sure he will turn into Mickey Mantle.
Ellsbury isn't anything great
by Edgar for Pres on Dec 8, 2007 3:18 PM PST up reply actions
less power?!?!?!
by MarinerintheDistrict on Dec 8, 2007 3:26 PM PST up reply actions
Minor league stats
Jacoby: .313/.389/.425
Scary similar huh?
They are pretty comparable with how much time they spent at each level besides Reed's last year in AAA.
by Edgar for Pres on Dec 8, 2007 3:57 PM PST up reply actions
I'd say
Felix and Liriano both have better stuff
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 3:30 PM PST up reply actions
Liriano is going to be scary.
I doubt that.
Read this: http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/fantasy/article/player-highlight-francisco-liriano/
Meh.
What do you mean "meh."
by Edgar for Pres on Dec 8, 2007 5:33 PM PST up reply actions
That's an incorrect oversimplification.
He did not make one pitch and suddenly it was injured. He made 134324123413241325345312423 pitches through 23 years of his life when finally it was damaged to the point it needed surgery. When he was born, his UCL was fine. After 134324123413241325345312423 pitches, it was not.
But now he has a new one, just as he did when he was born. He now has 134324123413241325345312423 pitches to injure it again. When he is 46, you're right. I will give you props for your astute analysis in 2029.
The pitches he threw at age 7
Sorry, man
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 6:24 PM PST up reply actions
Sorry, you're right
Why, just look at the horrific career of Mariano Rivera...
Wait...
TJS has been performed on 90 players in MLB. Of those, 4 players have received it more than once.
I don't see how you're anywhere close to right on this.
I'm a biomechanicist
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 6:32 PM PST up reply actions
You're welcome to
Wikipedia says you should read these:
# ^ Lyman, S., et al., Effect of pitch type, pitch count, and pitching mechanics on risk of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med, 2002. 30(4): p. 463-8.
# ^ Whiteley, R., Baseball throwing mechanics as they relate to pathology and performance - a review. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 2007. 6(1): p. 1-20.
# ^ Lyman, S., et al., Longitudinal study of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2001. 33(11): p. 1803-10.
Though I don't have access to them to validate their credibility.
They're not engineering analyses
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 6:38 PM PST up reply actions
Well, that's an interesting argument.
Injuries happen for a bunch of reasons
by Edgar for Pres on Dec 8, 2007 6:41 PM PST up reply actions
He was 31
My guess (purely hypothetical)
by Edgar for Pres on Dec 8, 2007 6:47 PM PST up reply actions
Seriously,
Ever since people have seen Liriano's slider (which he hadn't been throwing for very long - only a few years) they have warned of elbow trouble. If he continues throwing said slider, there is more elbow trouble in the future despite him already having surgery on said elbow.
I'm not worried about his recovery from TJ, but surgery doesn't fix the basic problem of him bollocksing up his elbow when he throws that pitch.
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 6:48 PM PST up reply actions
I was not comparing him to Tommy John
Or, I can put it another way.
If someone has a hernia after 20 years of wear and tear doing whatever, then it's helpful and should last them a while.
If someone busts their IVD by doing 50 weirdly contorted jumps in a row, and insist they're going to do so again... then my implant will fail then too.
Liriano's much more case #2 than case #1.
His elbow problems were predicted far in advance of them actuall flaring up, and in order to minimise the chances of him being reinjured he'll have to modify his delivery and thus lose some stuff.
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 6:56 PM PST up reply actions
Spinal discs, really?
CRANK IT TO 11, BAYBAAAAY!!!!
Failure is not a function
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 6:42 PM PST up reply actions
That's fine.
Do you have inside knowledge that says that the other 90% of people that successfully came back pitched differently than Liriano does? They all managed to provide the same stress, they came back. If you know something about Liriano, specifically, that validates your claim that he shares something in common with the 4% that failed, then that's different.
You're explaining to me how people fail, and that's great, but you're not explaining to me what makes Liriano likely to fail when few others have.
Yes, I do
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 6:49 PM PST up reply actions
Also
If you honestly think that every pitcher puts the same stresses on their joints, then there's not much point arguing. The very reason Liriano's stuff is so electric is because he's overloading his arm. He's being much harsher on it than a normal pitcher.
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 6:51 PM PST up reply actions
Good example
...
Felix Hernandez vs Jarrod Washburn
We are scared shitless for Felix. I wish Washburn's elbow would blow up but I highly doubt it.
by Edgar for Pres on Dec 8, 2007 6:58 PM PST up reply actions
If anything goes with Felix
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 7:00 PM PST up reply actions
Well this I have no response to.
If Liriano, unlike the other 95% of pitchers that recovered, has a way of throwing that will re-injure his arm, then okay. I hope you're wrong, but I have no problem with that statement.
Sorry if I wasn't being clear
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 7:05 PM PST up reply actions
Ha, Okay.
Tangent the subject, I hope Liriano does come back strong (changed delivery and what have you). He's exciting to watch. Plus he has a bad-ass name.
The problem is that changing his delivery
And yes, I'm a big Liriano fan too, and would love to see him fully healthy for a long time, with his full complement of stuff. I'm very skeptical of it happening, but I might be wrong, and I hope I am.
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 7:14 PM PST up reply actions
Heh, me too.
Yep.
Cool!
See, I told you it'd happen...
Graham used tongue.
And your oversimplification
Also, the new ligament isn't good as new. Its good but its not perfect. I hope he does well but I'm going to be cautious for all of next season.
by Edgar for Pres on Dec 8, 2007 6:35 PM PST up reply actions
It's not so much extreme stress
Fatigue failure happens much quicher when the stresses are out of plane from the fibril reinforcement, and ligaments are fairly isotropic in that regard (certainly more so than say a spinal disc).
by Graham MacAree on Dec 8, 2007 6:37 PM PST up reply actions
I was kinda guessing he only recently
by Edgar for Pres on Dec 8, 2007 6:40 PM PST up reply actions
If you haven't already
I truthfully don't know what to think
by Edgar for Pres on Dec 8, 2007 6:56 PM PST up reply actions
I didnt get it
I need to try reading it when im wide awake, which would not be now.
I take it, that it involves either Bedard or Lincecum?
Cubs or Orioles
I don't see how it'd be the Cubs
It was my initial thought after
After re-reading and doing more research, I landed on my assumption that is below
K, I think now its the Orioles
Johnson is probably Markakis
That makes a lot of sense
by Mariner John on Dec 8, 2007 11:06 PM PST up reply actions

by 










