On most any prospect list, Gonzales is in the Wieters/Snider/Adenhart/Brignac/Votto/Headley class, and I think it'd be a coup to get one of those guys.

I hear you on low-minors stats, but it's sort of striking to me to see a guy in that level put up a nearly 9:1 K:BB ratio.    Cut the K's in half and it's still an intriguing line.   I bet he's NOT a big K pitcher down the line, but with that kind of ratio his odds of making a rotation, even as a #4 guy, are higher than most.  
Most of the time you see teenagers with nice K ratios and meh command, or you see amazing ratios from college guys who are in the MWL at age 22-23.  

w/o Chris B. Young, I can't see how this is a good package for Haren.

None of the hitters project as anything but 1B/LF/RF/DH types, which the A's seem to find and develop with ease.  If all the guys reach their ceilings, your stuck with an overcrowded slow team and paying a lot ($$ or prospects) for up the middle talent.

I'll grant that Anderson looks interesting, but everyone else looks like back-of-rotation/bullpen filler and the A's are smart enough to know they can just bargain-bin those guys.  Everland and Smith don't really add value to a smart team who knows those guys can be found for less.

Haren was Beane's best trade chit, and he couldn't get an Grade A prospect back.

[Of course, I'm sure he threw a chair when Minaya traded Lastings Milledge for Schneider/Church.  Haren-for-Milledge would've been a great trade.]

Yeah, I know, "#1" is ambiguous. But while I don't think of him as an ace, he's still really good.