Good Article by Jim Caple...
with one huge glaring exception.
Caple's article offers up a reasoned rebuttal to the hordes of rabid sportswriters and fans who hate A-rod for his arrogance, phoniness, and supposed un-clutchiness.
He makes several great points about how talent matters far more than chemistry and all that junk, but then he gets to this:
I understand people worrying that signing A-Rod would preclude their team from obtaining other necessary players. But that's a needless concern. Signing someone like A-Rod, Derek Jeter or Manny Ramirez to a contract for $20 million to $25 million per year isn't what hurts a team financially. It's signing the likes of Jeff Weaver for $8 million and Richie Sexson for $15 million, then trading for Horacio Ramirez and his $2 million salary (not that I have any particular team in mind). As Bill Veeck once said, "It isn't the high price of stars that is expensive; it's the high price of mediocrity." In that sense, signing A-Rod might help financially, because you'll be less likely to waste your money on some stiff who won't produce (hello, Adrian Beltre).
Ah, Jim, you had me right up until those last two words!
47 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hahaha
Someone needs to put a copy of that on Lincoln's desk - his GM is the laughingstock of the baseball world.
Umm... Red should comment.
OK, so I just spent the last 20 minutes
You should email Caple
As for the number of games he watches, I'm guessing it's probably more than 10, since he lives in Portland he has pretty easy access to M's broadcasts...
Oh
I've met him a couple times
I shot him an email
We'll see, if he doesnt respond though...well, I wont do anything.
I heard he was constipated
I love Jim Caple
And he is hilariously dead-on (except for the Beltre part, but I think that is just laziness)
Only because...
Favor the Bold
i was going to post this too
"then trading for Horacio Ramirez and his $2 million salary "
i think someone needs to remind him that 1. ho makes more than 2 million... and hes coming back. and 2. we didnt just trade for him; we traded one of our best relief prospects for him
on the other points... sad... it hurts because its true...
except
by seattlebruin on Nov 14, 2007 1:07 PM PST up reply actions
Funniest thing was that
He's dead-on until the jab at Beltre.
There's a ridiculously stupid article by philbrick or something detailing why a team shouldn't get A-Rod. Terrible, terrible arguments
The theme of the day is "lazy"
I'm so lazy
ROTFLMFAO!!!
by PositivePaul on Nov 14, 2007 1:50 PM PST up reply actions
TROTHLMFAOBITLTADI
Even lazier

by PositivePaul on Nov 14, 2007 2:07 PM PST up reply actions
There was nothing wrong with that WEaver signing
Drunk Corco? Is that you?
Man.
by Phil Hatzenbuehler on Nov 14, 2007 2:38 PM PST up reply actions
Me too
He's in England.
A blog-thingy about the Mariners and stuff.
by BrettJMiller on Nov 14, 2007 2:53 PM PST up reply actions
I don't know whats sadder
My Beavis and Butthead joke of the day.
01101111
01101110
01100101
01110010
You misspelled
I'm glad someone posted this
Actually, has anyone noticed the ARod lovefest going on at espn.com right now? Their "sports nation" poll is pretty effing ridiculous ("Who would you rather have for $25M: A) Alex Rodriguez or B) Torii Hunter and Kyle Lohse").
c)
Actually that WAS option C...
My favorite one:
69.6% Alex Rodriguez
30.4% David Eckstein
Yup. 3 out of 10 people that frequent espn.com would rather have one of many Willie Bloomquist clones on their team than Alex "Best Player Of My Generation Or The One Before Me" Rodriguez.
And my friends wonder why I say never to take anything on espn or espn.com seriously any more.
Come now,
Until this year, UZR considered him a very good defender. And he has actually been an about average offensive player in 2 out of the last 3 years.
by rfloh @ Lookout Landing on Nov 15, 2007 10:06 AM PST up reply actions
Isn't that a bit much?
Being mostly right doesn't excuse
Ok I'll defend Caple
Over the last three years he has basically been average offensively. From Baseball Reference, he's been worth about 6 runs above average offensively and over the last three years I'd guess optimistically 25 runs above average defensively. That works out to about 10 runs above average per year for $12 million per year. Is 1 run above average worth a million dollars? I hope not.
I was expecting to see Beltre produce much like he did last year for the first two years of his contract. He isn't a bust because of what he did last year. What is killing him is how poorly he performed in the first two years of his contract (mostly 1st year).
We'll just need to wait back and see what type of production we can expect from Beltre as time goes on. I'm happy we have him but I think there is a strong case that can be made that at this point he has been a free agent bust.
2005 aside, he's produced exactly as I had hoped.
The only way you can see Beltre as a bust is if you honestly expected him to put up 2004 type numbers every year. Were that the case, he'd be A-Rod with better defense. Also, he's just now entering his peak years. He's been around so long that I think people forget that fact.

by 










