Callis delivers vicious Bavasi cockpunch!
Jim Callis gave his take on the Vidro fiasco. It was buried beneath an article on Jeff Samardzija. Not really anything that we haven't been saying for a while, but it is always nice to know that knowledgable outsiders agree with us:
Christmas Comes Early For Nats
Trades have a funny way of turning out differently than expected. Yet it's hard to envision a scenario where dealing for Jose Vidro is going to work out for the Mariners.
Beset by leg injuries, the 32-year-old Vidro is a shell of what he once was offensively and can't cover enough ground to play a passable second base. The Nationals owed him a total of $16 million over the next two seasons, and would have been content to just dump most of his salary, regardless of which players he would have brought in return.
But not only did Seattle pick up $12 million on Vidro's contract--not to mention give him a vesting option for 2009--but it also gave Washington two promising youngsters. Outfielder Chris Snelling hasn't been able to stay healthy, but he's fully capable of hitting for a higher average and more gap power than Vidro. Righthander Emiliano Fruto may be an enigma, but he'll show a plus-plus changeup, a plus fastball and a plus curve, and he should offer some bullpen help.
Vidro will DH for the Mariners, who gave up three more young players (Shin-Soo Choo, Asdrubal Cabrera and Shawn Nottingham) during the summer to acquire the DH platoon of Ben Broussard and Eduardo Perez from the Indians. Embattled Seattle GM Bill Bavasi has a mandate from ownership to win now, but the Vidro deal will hurt Seattle in the present and in the future.
I like how Callis puts the whole search for a DH in perspective. Basically, the M's have pissed away Snelling, Cabrera, Nottingham, Fruto, and Choo to acquire Vidro's albatross contract and whatever spare parts we got from trading Broussard.
Sweet.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The solution to our DH woes was with us all along
by Slozbury Stouvre on Jan 11, 2007 4:59 PM PST reply actions
This picture
by Jed C on Jan 12, 2007 7:08 AM PST up reply actions
Funny part is
Oh man
by Slozbury Stouvre on Jan 12, 2007 12:09 PM PST up reply actions
Callis hasn't been impressed with many M's moves.
What we need
Too late
He would have to pull off a few Kazmir trades to get back in the black.
Even if he did have a string of good moves starting right now (Rodrigo Lopez???), would you feel good about giving him another offseason?
I wouldn't.
He had his chance. Next!
I agree
I didn't mind Bavasi coming into the offseason. I liked his ability to trade scraps for prospects with a decent amount of upside, even if they weren't working in his favor, and the improvements we've made in the farm system and the scouting therein really cannot be understated.
But the Vidro trade, and other moves this offseason (and arguably going back to the middle of last year) reek of desperation, and I don't think enough of the stability of this team to want to sacrifice more young talent in an attempt to push it higher. Now we're deeper in the hole, as Jerry said, and it's going to be more difficult to pull ourselves out.
I'm still holding out hope that Bavasi will give some of the players still under club control some contract extensions that will carry them through the next few years at a reasonable rate, but...
Well said
I had mixed feelings about him coming into this offseason. He seemed to make good moves pretty often, but offset those by some really stupid ones (Washburn). But I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. He has to get some of the credit for turning around the farm system by bringing in Fontaine. And most of his small trades were pretty solid.
But my opinion of him just plumeted. I regret every nice thing I have ever written about him on any blog. The guy is just a completely failure.
Nothing less than a complete front office overhaul is acceptable.

by 










