Hargrove Definitely Staying???
Reports are cropping up (I heard from someone, and then confirmed the info in the comments on the USSM discussion of this morning's PI article discussing the Bavasi/Grover situation) that the M's FO just sent an e-mail to season ticket holders that both Bavasi and Hargrove will still be around in 2007.
WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF?
Can someone please hack into Ichiro's bubble and tell him to use his Samurai mind tricks in a meeting with Yamauchi to get rid of CHowArmLinStrong???
GOSH!
69 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Relax.
Bill Bavasi will continue to lead our baseball operations and Mike Hargrove will continue to manage the team.
It didn't say for how long, or mention anything specific about 2007. It's standard boilerplate PR - if the M's were my company, after Grover was fired they'd send out an email saying "we wish him well in his future endeavors".
Re: Ummm.....
--Stewie Griffin AND Josh Beckett
by Phil Hatzenbuehler on Sep 28, 2006 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions
TACOS!!!!
I can always count on ScruffyLefty for that one ;-)
by PositivePaul on Sep 28, 2006 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't worry
--Stewie Griffin AND Josh Beckett
by Phil Hatzenbuehler on Sep 28, 2006 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions
Ya
by Scruffy Lefty on Sep 28, 2006 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions
We shall see.
Nothing in that email said "Hargrove", "Manage", and "2007" in the same sentence. I'm fully aware that I may be parsing things a bit too much, but saying "Mike Hargrove will continue to manage the team" is different from saying "Mike Hargrove will be back for a third year as M's manager in 2007". there's still more of the 2006 season left, after all - not much, but still.
I may well be wishcasting here, but I can't believe that the Mariners would seriously consider guaranteeing Hargrove a job next year at this early stage of the off-season.
Hmmm...
But, then again, why would the FO send such a letter to the season ticket holders, where reasonable people and the media read this to mean 2007, and then do the complete opposite? Especially when they're sending the letter precisely to try and maintain some level of integrity with those season ticket holders?
I see no way to read this and believe that Hargrove and Bavasi aren't sticking around for '07.
by PositivePaul on Sep 28, 2006 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions
Marketing.
When in doubt, follow the dollar.
Season ticket sales drives started in earnest a few weeks ago. The last thing a prospective season ticket renewer or first-timer wants to hear is "Hey! Cool! Managerial upheaval! We don't know who's gonna be in charge yet, but it ain't gonna be Dudley! Buy now, and stay tuned!"
They want assurance that things are under control. Which, according to this email, they are. But words and actions are two different things.
If...
I'm right there with you...
The average PI-only-reading fan only knows or thinks about Hargrove's managerial ability via the well-worn tropes in the paper, so they'll be all over an email like the one the M's sent out today.
From a season ticket holder.
by mark s @ Lookout Landing on Sep 30, 2006 7:40 PM PDT up reply actions
Again, I reiterate...
Seriously. Howard and Chuck have got to go. It's waaaay past time.
Inept, Ignorant, No Good, Rotten....
Too Damn Mad
I still say we have to wait and see
oh well...GO M'S!! no matter who the captain is!
It ain't next season yet.
From Rotoworld:
Let's wait and see folks. Wait and see...
I'm from the camp
And, if this does become true, it leads me to believe that despite Bavasi and Hargrove not getting along on a wide array of issues, one or both decided to put these issues aside to retain a paycheck.
Please Everyone
by nnnick on Sep 28, 2006 4:05 PM PDT reply actions
Say it LOUD!
Dudley must go
For the team to grow
When Ichiro does not sign again with the M's, and they lose the Japanese market connection and money, this decision will cost them far more than the scooby snacks they are making by retaining Hargrove!
The continuity BS must have something to do with radio or TV contracts coming due (anyone know for sure?)...I can't see any other reason, unless Hargrove has pictures of Lincoln and company from Sheep Illustrated.
5 dollars richer
by WAB on Sep 28, 2006 4:19 PM PDT reply actions
Puts hands over ears
:Runs away:
Oh no
Then Cameron throws this comment up at USSM.
"I was wrong, obviously. Sorry. The information I get on almost everything from these guys has turned out to be accurate, so there wasn't any reason for me to not believe the same people when they talked about the managerial decision. Clearly, they either lied to me, embellished the truth, or weren't in a position to understand the full dynamics of the situation. If the situation was as bad as I was told it was, Hargrove wouldn't be back in `07. So, the only conclusion I can come to is that the information I've been given on the situation all year isn't reliable.
Sorry about that. I'll try to keep from making the same mistake again. "
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Why do they do this to us?
Explain to the common fan
If guys with inside sources are stating they were wrong, then it may well be the case that Grover gets to overlay his stupidity on the Mariners next season.
And if that is the case, I may just take 2007 off.
Yup
Let's hope they're full of shit.
by sadean62 on Sep 28, 2006 5:54 PM PDT reply actions
It did seem too good to be true
Not really,
by Coach @ Lookout Landing on Sep 28, 2006 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions
Wayyyyyyyyyy off topic
Drop the bomb
Ughh
This team is a wreck.
I won't add anything else about Grover staying, except that this makes my confidence in Bavasi that much worse.
The other things I thought were interesting:
-the talk of the payroll was very vague. In fact, it seemed almost deliberately so. If the M's were going to keep the payroll where it is, wouldn't they have mentioned it? If they were going to raise it, they would definitely have mentioned it. Ugh.
-the youth movement thing was repeatedly stated, over and over. There was little hints that the M's were going to be aggressive in free agency or add the last few pieces for a playoff run. That letter seemed very much like the front office still considers this a rebuilding team, not a contender.
This is really bad. I don't want to read too much into this, but that letter seriously downgraded my optimism for next year.
The Grover part is bad. But that was the anti-Art-Moreno line we just heard. That was the anti-Blue-Jays "we're going to spend what we need to spend" speech.
This is bad.
Ok, so I thought Hargrove would come back
He didn't cost us the post-season.
He protected Felix.
He stuck with Putz.
...
Ok, so his achievements are slim, but managers usually don't do much, are moderately destructive (Hargrove) or destroy their team (Baker, Melvin).
A little consistency might be good for the Mariners.
by John Morgan @ Lookout Landing on Sep 28, 2006 7:07 PM PDT reply actions
In fact...
GM>>>MG
by John Morgan @ Lookout Landing on Sep 28, 2006 7:19 PM PDT reply actions
I've always been meh on Bavasi
But I really really really want Fontaine to stay. And if Bavasi goes, he goes. And apparently by extension if Hargrove goes, Fontaine goes.
So is keeping Fontaine here worth keeping Hargrove here?
Next year if Hargrove is managing on opening day
by John Spartan @ Lookout Landing on Sep 28, 2006 7:21 PM PDT reply actions
And finally...
by John Morgan @ Lookout Landing on Sep 28, 2006 7:24 PM PDT reply actions
i like your optimism
I'm absolutely not shocked here
I don't think Hargrove sticking around for the 2007 season is impending doom. The real meat and potatos is what happens in the off-season. One thing that stands out in recent memory is that Team Bavasi fully admits to this being a young club. So what is the focus going to be in the off season? Will Bavasi try to make some smart acquisitions that help fill the need of the club at a good price or will he spend chunks on gritty veterans?
Seriously, if Bavasi can avoid picking up or keeping parts that we will desparately need to get rid of during the season this team will be in good shape.
Also, No Joel Pineiro, no Gil Meche, no Eddie Guardado, no Carl Everett. The ball is in Bavasi's court as to what kind of season we'll have in 2007.
I agree with you mostly, but...
by John Morgan @ Lookout Landing on Sep 28, 2006 8:07 PM PDT up reply actions
You're so sure of that?
I'd be $10 richer right now, except I foolishly hedged my bet by saying that the Mariners would bring Hargrove back if they won 82 games or more. I suspected that they'd bring him back with anything above 75 wins, but I chickened out at the last minute. Now I get neither $10 nor a manager who's worth a damn.
I'm not very hopeful for next season. Too damn many "if's." If Felix returns to his rookie season form. If Lopez recovers his home run stroke. If Ichiro doesn't lose too much from his form. If Beltre doesn't suck. If Reed returns to the player we hoped he'd be, or if Jones develops ahead of schedule. If the M's can sign a premier starter. If ... if ... if. A new manager might not have been better than Hargrove, but he at least would have been more interesting. My greatest fear now is the Mariners of 2007 will yet again flirt with 90 losses and the whole thing will be a tedious ordeal. If so, Hargrove and his depressingly predictable flaws will be the most tedious of them all.
Hmm
Oh and everyone here says hargrove isn't any good with young players but this is based on the fact that he plays his veterans consistantly. Well, coaches do more than just write the lineup card. They are also involved in preping players and making sure that they improve. (I don't think this is actually true but this is the only thing that I could think of that would make Mariners management not look like huge liers.)
So maybe we shouldn't lose too much sleep over a PR newsletter that was sent out to try to get people to buy tickets. Take it for what its worth and then weight that with Hargrove being a horrible manager and what you feel about Bavasi and the FO and come to your own opinion. Mine isn't too optimistic but I can't see into the future so we are going to need to wait until we get more concrete info.
This is fantastic news!!
Hey Jeff, could you send that $5 to the nearest Animal Control Shelter? That will help make up for some of my bad feelings. When I read this news on the M's website I nearly kicked my dog.
That's not a bad idea.
by Jeff Sullivan on Sep 28, 2006 8:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes!
Yes
by sadean62 on Sep 28, 2006 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Take my $5...
You're way overvaluing a manager...
As a journalism major with a focus on the online medium I hate to call anyone out, but this is the internet equivalent of a "slow news day".
Hargrove might be the P-NW net's favorite punching bag, but really most studies point to a manager's value amounting to about this ->||<- much.
by John Morgan @ Lookout Landing on Sep 28, 2006 8:23 PM PDT up reply actions
I suppose I should change my signature now
Now it's obvious I(we) will not win.
So I surrender. You win Mike. Congratulations.
Now we all get to pay the price.
Bear with me...it's long
Hey Corey, long time no comment. Hope you still read USSM and such. I remember talking with you about that at my job-shadow game...
My thoughts? My thoughts are that this decision shows one thing to the fans. Safety is more important than winning. Choward Linstrong is concerned with making cheap, afforadble, mediocre signings like Claudio Vargas that make the team reach 81 wins than they are about being bold and reaching out for guys like Jason Schmidt and Daisuke Matsuzaka.
Many people will cite Adrian Beltre and Richie Sexson as examples of the front office being comfortable handing out contracts for big name players. With a disappointing first year, Beltre may have made Choward Linstrong wary about signing big-ticket free agents. However, the two have had great years this year... Beltre's basic rate stats are .266/.327/.450 For a third baseman who plays gold glove D and is a right hander playing half his games in Safeco, that's an all-star performance. Sexson is slugging nearly .500 again. Big players perform. 2001 was the worst thing to ever happen to this organization, because it taught the suits that cheap players are superstars. But it was a matter of career-year luck.
Talent evaluation is key in free agent signings however. The Mariners were fooled by Jarrod Washburn's shiny 3.20 ERA in 2005. They failed to realize he stranded 81% of his baserunners, which is something that isn't really a repeatable skill. Sure enough, Washburns hit, HR, and BB rate are all pretty much the same, yet his ERA is about a full point higher. Jarrod's a solid pitcher, a #2 or #3...but he deserves a 4 year, $27 Million dollar contract. Not 4 years, $37 million. They hired a stat guy for a reason--Choward! Consult Mat Olkin more often!
Carl Everett is a proven run producer. Yeah, that sure was a good idea....
Personally, I think the idea that Mike Hargrove is staying will scare off hundreds of season ticket holders. Keep in mind, with Chris Snelling rotting away in AAA, Mike gave 300 ABs to Carl Everett. When Jose Lopez was slugging .500 in May, Mike Hargrove told him to lay down a sacrifice bunt THREE TIMES! Next AB, Raul Ibanez, who has not laid down a successful sacrifice bunt since 2003 is asked to lay down a sac bunt. Needless to say, we lost in extras. Why? Oh yeah, Mike was afraid to use his closer in a tie, so Everyday I blow a save Eddie gave up a walk-off home run.
There's more, but I digress. Mike loves his veterans. This team needs a manager who has fire. Who will play the youngsters. Who is noticably the boss. That man is Dan Rohn. Unfortunately, he said what everyone on U.S.S. Mariner, Lookout Landing, etc. all thought--that Mike Hargrove is a terrible manager. Loyalty is valued over competence in Seattle, so of course, Mike stayed, Dan is gone. No questions asked. The Mariners will only win a World Series under Mike Hargrove if they win in Spite of him. If Thome, Baerga, Manny Ramirez, Albert Belle, Robby Alomar, Kenny Lofton, Charles Nagy, the good version of Jose Mesa, and Omar Vizquel, all in their prime, can't do it...no one can.
I think this move is in essence writing off the 2007 season, Corey. Honestly, if you want a more fun job, start looking Corey. Don't be like the rest of us. Look for a team that is concerned with winning, not a 2.5 million fan-per-year goal. Winning brings fans. The front office needs to quit being such penny pinchers. Spending leads to wins, wins lead to fans, fans lead to money. Be bold, and you will win. Win, and the fans will come. Bring the fans, and it will bring in the dough. The organization is too gun-shy. Loyalty and continuity matters more than the product they sell their fans. Being bold is a necessity. I would like you to stay Corey, you're a good writer, but you deserve better. If you can...find a team that wants to win.
Howard Lincoln stated the team's mission statement of mediocrity perfectly...
"All you have to do is walk around and talk to people in the stands. It's apparent there are fun things to do besides baseball. Sometimes you can sit with a group of 20 or so, and there will be one guy with his arms crossed saying `Why don't they do this or that,' and the rest are there for other reasons." -- Howard Lincoln.
What about those of us who don't go for the social event, just to have fun? What about those of us that love baseball? What about those of us that DO sit there with our arms crossed saying "Why didn't they do this or that?" What that tells me, is that Howard Lincoln doesn't care what I think, he doesn't care about my money. I wish I'd be able to stay away. But I won't be going to thirty games next year. Maybe I'll go to ten. And I won't spring for the good seats. $7 seats all year. At least I hope they're $7. They raised after we lost last year. At least with as many people abandonining this team after hearing Hargrove is back, I'll be able to sit wherever I want.
Good luck Mariners Players!
I hope you lose your jobs, Mike Hargrove, Howard Lincoln and Chuck Armstrong!

by 















