Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dissecting Nick Diaz's Positive Drug Test

On WE and Bullpen Usage

We all seem to agree that Hargrove, as well as most managers, do not use their bullpen in a way that helps the team the most - using crappier pitchers in high leverage situations early in the game and the best reliever (typically) based on save situations alone.

A lot of our complaints stem from Win Expectancy - looking at the daily charts and the WE data, we see that getting out of a tight situation in the 7th inning can improve a team's WE much more than closing the door in the 9th.  However, there may be a problem - I'm not sure how big - in analyzing bullpen usage this way.

WE is based on data from 1979 - 1990.  During this time, the traditional closer role was well established, though there probably were exceptions (managers who used their bullpen differently, or Mariano-type closers who often came in before the 9th).  So the data is based on the outcomes of "traditional" usage we see (and complain about) today.  

Because of this, perhaps the WE is still low with a close game in the 6th or 7th in part because lesser-skilled relievers were used in these earlier innings throughout the 1980s, and the leads were often blown by those pitchers.  And the WE shoots up so much after these innings because, once they get through them, the best pitchers typically finished off the game successfully.

If, during the decade, the best pitchers were used in the earlier innings as many suggest should happen, the WE would likely already be higher when they enter, since those middle innings are better protected.  Further, getting through the 6th - 8th may not increase the WE as much as it currently does if the best pitcher wasn't saved for the 9th during the decade of data - there would have been more blown 9th inning leads, and this would be reflected in a lower WE entering the 9th.  Thus, there would be a lower WE going into the 9th with a lead, and the pitcher who closes out the game would get a higher WE value than he currently does.

I doubt the change would be that drastic, and I agree that the best bullpen arm should not be saved for the 9th when there is an important situation earlier in the game, but it is something to consider.  Please point out if this is wrong for any reason - I went into this with a clear idea of what I intended to say and proceeded to get more and more confused as I wrote.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

WE is not based on 1979-1990 data.
I used that program a year ago, but this time I'm using a probabilistic spreadsheet from the Hardball Times.

by Jeff Sullivan on Apr 22, 2006 2:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Well then,
nevermind.

Is there a simple way to explain how they develope their probabilities?

by david h on Apr 22, 2006 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's all based
on the percentage of instances that a team, in each particular situation, won and lost.

by Gomez on Apr 22, 2006 3:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Moar_bacon_small
Everything I Know About Jesus Montero

Recent FanPosts

Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
OTDOD - Early February Edition
Agentejebaox3_small
A Statistical Analysis of Mariners' Fan Support
Small
Who will have a better season?
Claw_small
BA's Top 10 M's Prospects
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Munenori Kawasaki Predictions!!!
Small
The Longevity and Future Success of Felix Hernandez.
Small
The present vs future conundrum

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew