Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Hmm.

Earlier this afternoon I was standing in line at the Providence bus station, passing the time by eavesdropping on a conversation going on to my right. Two girls and a guy - I took them to be UConn students - were chatting about how they'd spent the weekend, and how they weren't looking forward to getting back to school. It was a pretty generic, nondescript conversation, but just as I was about to shift my attention to the people at my left, one of the girls casually mentioned that, one weekend during first semester, she didn't have anything to on Saturday night so she decided to up and walk to Providence. From Storrs. Apparently, she didn't have enough money to take the bus. For those of you who aren't familiar with the area, that's 50-odd miles, and she said it took her something like eight and a half or nine hours to do.

The point? People do stupid things. And right now, I'm no exception. Although it's not quite at the level of going outside on a chilly Connecticut evening and walking consecutive marathon lengths on a whim (or letting Bill Leavy ref the Super Bowl), It's against my better judgment to write about something when I'm angry, and yet here I am, alternating keystrokes with curse words when I know I'll regret doing this in the morning.

I'll say this: last year hurt me worse. After Engram dropped that would-be touchdown at the end of the game, I collapsed on the floor and didn't move or speak for 30 minutes. Seattle had no business losing that game, and I couldn't believe it. This time around, I think part of me saw it coming, so the inherently pessimistic section of my brain was able to prepare the rest of my body for the inevitable letdown. The urge to become a silent, motionless heap of agony was conspicuously absent in the aftermath, although instead of yielding to serenity, I found that the feeling was replaced by a burning desire to issue an angry breathless rant to anyone who would listen.

That game sucked. Although I'm obviously not an impartial observer, it seemed to me like the Seahawks were the better team on the field for most of the day, which makes this a tough pill to swallow. And, yeah, as much as I hate to be one of those people, I think you do have to look at how the refereeing job by Bill Leavy and the rest of the crew influenced the game. Seattle lost a touchdown in the first quarter on an incredibly weak offensive pass interference call. In the fourth, what could've been a first-and-goal situation from the Pittsburgh two turned into a first-and-twenty from somewhere around the 35 after Leavy called Seattle for a hold that even John Madden couldn't spot in the slow-motion replay. Mind you, this is the same John Madden who never stops repeating "holding happens on every single play" in his line of EA Sports video games. If John Madden can't see a hold, there probably wasn't a hold. It doesn't help that, on top of all of this, the Steelers were offsides on the play. Oh yeah, and there was also a Roethlisberger rushing touchdown sandwiched in between those two questionable calls, a play during which the ball never really appeared to break the plane.

This game wasn't about Seattle failing to cash in its opportunities - it was about them failing to cash them in twice. After the first call, they wound up settling for a long field goal; after the second, Hasselbeck made a Favre-esque pass to a group of yellow jerseys, returning possession to the Steelers and eventually leading to a back-breaking touchdown. Sure, you can make the argument that the Seahawks should've done more with the ball after each of the calls, but I don't think that's fair. Hasselbeck had two of the best passes he threw all day go for naught due to a pair of controversial flags, and the result is that he has to spend another offseason dealing with the reputation of being someone who can't step it up on a big stage, even though he clearly outplayed his adversary. Matt could've made some better throws, but it's hard to stay in a rhythm when two of your biggest plays get erased for reasons you don't understand. And besides, "Big Ben" finished the day 9-21 with a pair of interceptions. Roethlisberger's a hell of a quarterback, but one play aside, he didn't look real good today, and it sucks for Matt that he'll have to answer dozens of difficult questions over the coming weeks while everyone forgets that he was the better QB on the field in the biggest game of the season.

It'd be great if people would ease up on Josh Brown, too. The guy missed kicks from 50 and 54 yards. They weren't exactly chip shots.

I guess what hurts the most is that, on a day when the Steelers clearly weren't at their best, the Seahawks weren't, either, and they weren't able to snap out of it before time expired. Now they're going to be "that team who totally sucked in the Super Bowl" for God knows how long, even though Pittsburgh is every bit as deserving of that distinction as Seattle. Both teams could've done some things a lot better - from the Seahawks' point of view, for example, they could've managed the clock more efficiently at the end of the first half, and Jerramy Stevens could've brought his hands to the stadium. It's hard to believe this was the same team we saw roll Carolina two weeks ago. There were definite similarities, but this was a different group, one that seemed more intent on proving how good it is to the audience than on just playing with the confidence that it can do whatever it wants against any team in the league.

When the Seahawks are firing on all cylinders, they're the best team in the NFL, a team that probably could've beat today's Steelers by a pair of touchdowns. And yet, where they were nearly flawless against the Panthers two weeks ago, they didn't finish the season playing their best football. This was the friggin' Super Bowl, and for whatever reason, the Seahawks didn't play to the best of their ability at a time when some questionable calls absolutely demanded that they do so. More than anything else, I think that's what stings so bad. And it's going to sting for a while.

Go Mariners.

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The officiating was HORRIBLE
and this is coming from someone who rooted against Seattle.

That being said, the game was great for the first half, close and an exciting game.Even though they were down by 4, the Seahawks were obviously the better team in the first half.

When I was a kid my parents moved around alot.But I always found them. ~Rodney Dangerfield

by Goose on Feb 5, 2006 10:11 PM PST reply actions  

Forget the Terrible Towel
the zebras have been Pittsburgh's 12th man for a long time now. From the '96 AFC championship game, and through these playoffs, no team got more of the breaks so consistantly.

by Matthew on Feb 5, 2006 10:17 PM PST up reply actions  

that's why
the refs kept throwing the Terrible Towel all game long.

by jtopps on Feb 5, 2006 10:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Josh Brown
and he was close too, not like a Vanderjagt miss.

Really tough game to take. I said in the diary thread, that this type of outcome, when they should have won and nobody's going to know that except Seattlites, is the hardest type to take.

Yet again, another reason why the two week layoff after the conference finals is just really stupid. A terribly played game on all three sides of the ball.

Despite the toughness of this loss, and in contrast to the Sonics loss in game six, I feel like this team is going to get another chance. I wouldn't be too shocked to see a Philly like run out of Seattle for the next few years.

by Matthew on Feb 5, 2006 10:13 PM PST reply actions  

Addendum
A good article for those of us who'll be complaining about the officiating in this game for the next ten years:

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5310192

by Jeff Sullivan on Feb 5, 2006 10:24 PM PST reply actions  

officiating once more
What did the US announcers have to say about the officiating? Daryl Johnston of the international crew was highly critical.

by vj on Feb 6, 2006 2:28 AM PST reply actions  

Madden and Micheals critized it several times
Including one time(I think the Hasselbeck"chop" play) where Madden flat out said the Ref's were wrong.
When I was a kid my parents moved around alot.But I always found them. ~Rodney Dangerfield

by Goose on Feb 6, 2006 2:33 AM PST up reply actions  

He said
they were wrong there, wrong on the "holding" call that cost Seattle at least 7 points and the game for sure, wrong on the "pass interference call". Madden said it frequently but never really called them out.

by Matthew on Feb 6, 2006 6:59 AM PST up reply actions  

What Johnston said:
after the Hasselbeck fumble, before it was overturned he said that he couldn't believe how bad the officiating was.

by vj on Feb 6, 2006 7:09 AM PST up reply actions  

Hey guys
Sorry about that, I mean, come on, I had to do it. I got a million dollars from Mr. Rooney, a million from the NFL, all for just my dignity!

by RefLeahy on Feb 6, 2006 6:50 AM PST reply actions  

Screw Dignity!
I'm printing this off and taping one to my car window, and on my cubicle wall at work:

http://acuitydesign.com/uploads/SuperBowlXL.doc

by PositivePaul on Feb 6, 2006 7:21 AM PST reply actions  

re. the phantom touchdown
Something I haven't heard yet about that call:

Yes, there wasn't clear and convincing evidence to overturn the call on the field - the replay was called correctly. My beef is this: why did he call it a touchdown in the first place? It was clear that ref wasn't sure at first, raising only one arm, but then when Roethlisberger snuck it across (already down, of course), the other arm shot up.

This was either bad officiating, or prejudice towards the Steelers. Had the original call been a stop, 4th down, that replay would not have been called a touchdown.

I'm not usually one for conspiracy theories, but after this game, I'm starting to wonder.

by peterpeter on Feb 6, 2006 8:15 AM PST reply actions  

Re;Phantom touchdown
That's the only call I dismiss, because I'm pretty sure they would of scored on the next play.It would of been 4th and like 1.5 inches.
When I was a kid my parents moved around alot.But I always found them. ~Rodney Dangerfield

by Goose on Feb 6, 2006 4:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Roethlisberger's Phanton TD...
...is a red herring.

The real question is, what were the Steelers doing down by the goal at all?  Pitt's completion on 3rd-and-long was, if anything, more blatantly pass interference than Jackson's pushoff.

by ajp on Feb 6, 2006 8:22 AM PST reply actions  

Two Week Layovers
Seem to mess up teams in the NFL backwards, forwards, left and right. I picked that up from an analyst - that teams with the bye week just don't seem to get it going.

I'm not seeing anything to make me think that guy's wrong yet.

I kind of liked watching the Steelers this season. They were the underdog of the east, and the thing is that they're a darn balanced team (like our boys).

Both teams played like absolute crap. The refs had me thinking the game might be fixed. The super bowl ticket lottery looked fixed. The media coverage was smarmy and bad. Oh, and the NFL managed to look bad not just at home, but internationally.

Bah.

by tbakajanai on Feb 7, 2006 1:55 AM PST reply actions  

This is true, though
I think the endless media attention and hype during the week prior has a little to do with it as well.

by Gomez on Feb 7, 2006 10:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Walk to Providence
I call BS on that girl.  According to Yahoo maps it's 53 miles from Storrs to Providence.  For her to get there in 9 hours she would have to be walking about 6 miles an hour.  That's not taking bathroom, rest, and eating breaks into account.  You should have called her out for being a liar.  

by chris martin on Feb 7, 2006 7:45 AM PST reply actions  

Hmm
There's a point there.  I have run on a treadmill at 6.0 mph, and let me say it's impossible to do that speed without a brisk jog at all times.

Maybe, if she went from the far eastern edge of Storrs to the far western edge of Providence, she sliced off a couple of miles, but 5.5 mph is still a jog.

Yeah, walking briskly, even to the western edge of the PVD it would still take one over 11 hours.

by Gomez on Feb 7, 2006 10:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

By reading a game thread of your own volition you agree to accept all liability for any and all damage done to your delicate sensibilities.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Starlin Castro's fit with Seattle
Kawasaki80_small
Lists! So many lists!
M_s_hat_copy_small
OT -- May 22nd In Memoriam
Ichiro_small
Why do managers and media members hate walks?
Wbc_029_small
Friday Morning Music Thread
Small
Dustin Ackley BP swing vs game swing
Beastquakerwallpaper_small
More on the Struggles of Smoak
Randy2_for_sbn_small
Albert Pujols 2012: Three Retrospectives
Small
On Batting Orders
Niehaus_small
More on Dustin Ackley and the strikezone

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Sexy People

Wbc_029_small Jeff Sullivan

Small Matthew

Claw_small JY